Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Scot Lehigh channels BMG; commits “speech and debate” gaffe

November 14, 2008 By David

Scot Lehigh’s op-ed today calls on Speaker DiMasi to “come clean or go,” and urges that “if you can’t or won’t be candid and forthcoming, then you need to face this reality: It’s time to go.”  Startlingly reminiscent of BMG’s call to the Speaker from a few days ago: “He’s got to put up, or step down.”

In any event, Lehigh’s column focuses mostly on the political aspects of the DiMasi/Cognos brouhaha.  It does, however, make one brief foray into the legal morass into which I’ve been wading for the last few days — and gets it quite wrong.  Here’s Lehigh:

[T]he decision to invoke constitutional privilege to withhold information from the Ethics Commission is hardly yours alone.

“Because the privilege is meant to protect the separation of powers, the ultimate decision rests with the House, not the individual,” notes attorney Harvey Silverglate.

With all due respect to Lehigh, and to Mr. Silverglate, the SJC has held precisely to the contrary in our old friend Coffin v. Coffin:

In considering this article, it appears to me that the privilege secured by it is not so much the privilege of the house as an organized body, as of each individual member composing it, who is entitled to this privilege, even against the declared will of the house. For he does not hold this privilege at the pleasure of the house; but derives it from the will of the people, expressed in the constitution, which is paramount to the will of either or both branches of the legislature…. Of these privileges, thus secured to each member, he cannot be deprived, by a resolve of the house, or by an act of the legislature.

It remains unclear whether Article 21 extends to the records DiMasi is attempting to shield.  But it is clear that the privilege afforded by Article 21 is personal to DiMasi (and to every other individual legislator), and that “the ultimate decision” as to whether it may be invoked does not rest with the House.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bmg, dimasi, globe, lehigh

Comments

  1. eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii says

    November 14, 2008 at 11:34 am

    That’s my job

  2. ryepower12 says

    November 14, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    and law. and blogging.

    <

    p>It’s time you be upfront about what you’re bad at, David!  

    • david says

      November 14, 2008 at 1:16 pm

      Tall enough to rebound OK, but no jump shot.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.