Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Recovery Package Will Invest Billions in Massachusetts Innovation, Job Creation

January 30, 2009 By rep-ed-markey-d-ma 13 Comments

Van testified, “If we are smart, we will make the invention, manufacturing and deploying of clean energy technology a cornerstone of the next American economy – and create green pathways out of poverty, while we do it.”

With the support included in this package, we will do just that. The massive investments in weatherization, state energy efficiency grants, and federal building efficiency are some of the safest and smartest investments our country can make right now. They put money into the

pockets of American workers and pay for themselves in the form of energy savings and lower energy prices. This energy efficiency “double dividend” is a proven, reliable phenomenon that our current weak economy must exploit.

The Select Committee recently released a Green Economic Recovery information sheet detailing how the stimulus package will re-power America, doubling our renewable energy production and investing $69 billion in jobs that put shovels in the ground and windmills in the sky. It will jump start waste-cutting efficiency projects and invest in desperately needed advanced battery technologies to ensure the clean cars of tomorrow are built here at home. Read the report here:

http://globalwarming.house.gov…

The recovery package provides tax relief for 95% of Americans and targets investments in key areas to turn around the economy. We are facing enormous challenges in Massachusetts, but we also have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create new jobs, invest in vital priorities and position our economy for future growth. This package is a major down payment on the clean, renewable energy future Massachusetts and this country have been waiting for and desperately need. I strongly urge you to join me in supporting the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

You can send me your comments via my site: http://markey.house.gov/email

Speaker Pelosi’s site has more information on the different provisions in the package: http://www.speaker.gov/newsroo…

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: energy, markey, massachusetts, recovery-package, stimulus, van-jones

Comments

  1. stomv says

    January 30, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Rep Markey:

    <

    p>The Boston metro area is suffering greatly because there’s poor linkage for pedestrians and bicyclists.  Boston’s got a handful of 2+ mile separated paths (Esplanade, Emerald Necklace, Southeast Corridor, Harbor Trail), but they don’t connect to each other, severely limiting their usefulness for exercise or transportation.  The bridges connecting Cambridge to Boston (BU, Mass Ave, Longfellow) are key for non-motorized traffic too, but are in desperate need for some amenities like bike lanes and sufficiently wide sidewalks.  There was supposed to be a footbridge near Science Park connecting foot and bike traffic in that neighborhood as part of the Big Dig… never happened.

    <

    p>Relative to most projects, pedestrian and bicycle projects are cheap.  A few projects, chosen wisely, could connect already existing and currently funded parts of the network, resulting in Boston metro becoming a far better place for walkers, joggers, cyclists, and the disabled.  Remember, as a flat, dense area which pre-dates cars by a few hundred years, Boston is the perfect place for non-motorized traffic.  It’s good for health.  It’s good for the environment.  It’s good for businesses.  It’s good for the other drivers.  It’s a winner for all — but it takes real money and a vision that once projects get connected the number of users will shoot up.

    <

    p>I know there are some non-auto transit projects in the list, but frankly, there aren’t enough.  Please keep working on getting money to connect and strengthen the multiple non-auto networks in the Boston area, and Massachusetts as a whole.

    Log in to Reply
  2. joes says

    January 30, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    And $11B to Massachusetts will help immensely.

    <

    p>To some degree counter-cyclical spending will be OK, but investment spending should be much more beneficial.  Is there an analysis for each major component of spending that estimates the long term payoff of the investment?

    <

    p>For example, if we invest $X in computerizing health care records, how much annual savings in health care costs are estimated to be realized?

    <

    p>Or, if we invest in infrastructure to transform our Cities, how much private investment in the area will it spur?  Will it help create a smart growth zone that is environmentally friendly both from the point of view of energy generation/consumption and transportation efficiency?  We may want to consider the most effective road is the one that does not have to be built.

    <

    p>A counter argument to the current bill is that the government would spend $275K for each job created.  But if those jobs were to last 10, 20 or more years, that may well be a good investment.

    <

    p>What I think is missing from the public view is an analysis of each investment that estimates the return on the investment.  And even if some proposed investments cannot be justified from the “ROI” point-of-view, it may stand on the merits of counter-cyclical spending to ease the economic pain.  However, for that type of spending, it should not be considered a means to propogate ineffective spending through the economic malaise to better times.  That would be a grave error.

    Log in to Reply
  3. ryepower12 says

    January 30, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    the budget deficit would be great, but I do applaud this first effort in what it should deliver for the state of Massachusetts. But, seriously, we need some federal help for our structural deficit.  

    Log in to Reply
    • stomv says

      January 30, 2009 at 2:42 pm

      Some capital expenditures result in larger operational deficits.  In general, a new road falls into this category.

      <

      p>Other capital expenditures result in a reduction in operations costs, for example replacing/upgrading MBTA tracks and signals.

      <

      p>I hope that the emphasis on the stimulus bill is to build projects which maintain or reduce operations costs (or result in increased revenue to match the expenses), instead of those which will cost future generations money year after year.

      Log in to Reply
  4. barbara-hill says

    January 30, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Dear Congressman Markey –

    <

    p>Your support of the economic stimulus package is much appreciated.  But there is a shovel ready clean energy project poised to create thousands of jobs for Massachusetts citizens that has earned your support.  

    <

    p>On January 16 of this year, the US Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service released the Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cape Wind finding significant public interest benefits while identifying no major environmental impacts.

    <

    p>You are fortunate enough to hold the influential Chairmanship that will help shape clean energy initiatives across this country, while at the same time developing policies that invests in projects that will get our economy moving, mitigate climate change and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.  No project encompasses these principles than Cape Wind.  

    <

    p>Supporting Cape Wind will demonstrate your commitment to ending global warming and creating a vibrant clean energy industry in Massachusetts.

    <

    p>The time is now because we need the jobs.

    <

    p>Barbara Hill
    Clean Power Now
    http://www.cleanpowernow.org  

    Log in to Reply
    • joes says

      January 30, 2009 at 3:28 pm

      Not only for energy, but for the jobs that would be needed to create the project.  Let’s hope those jobs are local, and not in some far off land.

      Log in to Reply
    • cos says

      January 30, 2009 at 3:33 pm

      Agreed.

      <

      p>My top two “why the hell haven’t they started working on these yet, they should’ve been done years ago!” frustrations in Massachusetts are Cape Wind and the Green Line extension.

      <

      p>Why haven’t we started them already?

      Log in to Reply
      • paddynoons says

        January 30, 2009 at 3:46 pm

        Those two great projects are delayed because NIMBY plaintiffs can tie them up for years in administrative proceedings and then litigation.  It’s really not the fault of “government” per se.  Well intentioned environmental laws have become a cudgel for parochial anti-development interests.

        <

        p>It can happen to even something as simple and obviously beneficial as adding bicycle lanes and racks in San Francisco — http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/poli…

        <

        p>These laws mandating study after study, hearing after hearing, etc., need to be reevaluated.

        Log in to Reply
        • bob-neer says

          January 30, 2009 at 4:34 pm

          That seems to cover just about everything these days 😉

          Log in to Reply
          • paddynoons says

            January 30, 2009 at 5:17 pm

            I bet John Yoo could write a great memo justifying that!

            <

            p>Or how about a new Czar.  But instead of just the nomenclature, we actually give him dictatorial powers 🙂

            Log in to Reply
    • bobhenry says

      January 31, 2009 at 10:25 pm

      Miss Hill,

      <

      p>     I believe that Cape Cod is a unique natural resource that should not be destroyed by placing windfarms in Natucket sound. I live in Maine but spend much time on Cape Cod with my family in Centerville, Mass. Here in Maine
      another 59 Megawatts of windpower just went online making a
      total of 165Megawatts of Maine windpower going into the ISO
      New England power grid. There are many undeveloped areas in
      New England where wind farms can be located an abundance of wind power produced. I am for wind power, however I
      find your Cape Wind project objectionable. While, many have
      characterized the units as specks on the horizon, I believe that to be misleading. And that the true nature of the project if realized will be a net negative to your cause. Perhaps you should consider locating your project
      in the berkshires. Another concern is the location of the
      power along the migratory bird route. While there have been some improvements in design the high tip speed of the
      blades do present a threat to our feathered friends.

      <

      p>Regards,

      <

      p>Bob Henry

      <

      p>Copy to Rep. Markey  

      Log in to Reply
      • stomv says

        February 1, 2009 at 10:45 am

        Bob Henry:

        <

        p>We need wind power in the Berkshires and the Cape.  Cape Wind is something like 468 MW of installation.  59 is cool, and a total of 165 is good stuff.  468 dwarfs it in terms of capacity.  Furthermore, the quality of wind on the Horseshoe Shoal exceeds the quality at the Maine wind farms or the Berkshires, meaning that if you put identical turbines at all three places, the turbine at Cape Wind would generate more MWh per year than the others.

        <

        p>Now, put your arm out in front of you, fully extended.  Make a thumbs up sign.  The wind turbine will appear smaller on the horizon than your thumb nail.  On a day which isn’t clear, you likely won’t see them at all.

        <

        p>As for our feathered friends — Cape Wind has passed it’s environmental studies.  Bird kill simply isn’t a legitimate fear at this site.

        Log in to Reply
      • barbara-hill says

        February 1, 2009 at 11:32 am

        Dear Mr. Henry –

        <

        p>My home is in Centerville where I live with my family and feel very fortunate to be in such a beautiful place.  I believe this project is just the right one for where I live.  

        <

        p>Nantucket Sound which is a mile from my home is where is swim as early in June and as late in October as I can.  Also Nantucket Sound is over 500 square miles.  The area in which Cape Wind will be built is approximately 25 square miles.  Clearly Cape Wind will not destroy Nantucket Sound.  

        <

        p>The turbines will be placed 2 – 3 football fields apart from one another so recreational boating will be possible.  I was fortunate to visit Denmark and sailed around the Nysted Wind Farm so I know first hand this is real.  

        <

        p>The winds offshore are more powerful and steadier than on land. When Cape Wind is on line it will supply on average 3/4 of the electrical needs of Cape Cod, Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard.  

        <

        p>In terms of the birds, MA Audubon over the past 6 years have been conducting survery’s and analyzing potential impacts.  In June 2006 MA Audubon came to the conclusion there was more harm to the avian population from fossil fuels emissions than Cape Wind and they gave their conditional approval to the project.  

        <

        p>There is no energy source without impacts but I feel the Cape Wind project serves us on many levels not the least is jobs.  

        <

        p>After 8 years of regulatory review (more than any nuclear, oil or gas project in NE) and 5 major state and federal reports the conclusion is that the Cape Wind project has significant public interest benefits with minor environmental and socio-economic impacts.  

        <

        p>And finally, I feel we have a moral responsibility to tap into an indigeneous renewable source of energy right off our coast to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the effects of climate change. We can’t keep saying put it someplace else.  It is time to take charge of our energy future and we can do it here on Cape Cod and be a symbol of the renewable energy revolution right here off our coast in Nantucket Sound.  Just because some people don’t want to see them is not important enough in light of what the stakes are.  

        <

        p>Sincerely,

        <

        p>Barbara Hill

        Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)
  • Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance? (1)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 5 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesYou hit the nail on the head here. Namely: Holier than T…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI appreciate you writing this diary. This primary seems…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingKLEPTOCRAT GRIFTERINO is not the VICTIM; he's the PERPET…
  • Christopher on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingRepublicans: How dare Merrick Garland politicize the DOJ…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
54m

Surprise, surprise . . . the next pandemic has arrived. https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/14/surprise-surprise-the-next-pandemic-has-arrived/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1558963062329131010 Retweet on Twitter 1558963062329131010 Like on Twitter 1558963062329131010 Twitter 1558963062329131010
jessamynejones Jessamyn Jones @jessamynejones ·
56m

But thanks for the lawn tour of WR’s rich white progressives who demean & disparage their middle & working class neighbors for sport. Like Tonya T, who split $7.5 MILLION w/her ex in divorce & also gets $14k/MONTH alimony. Public record. No Fair Share 🪧 for her! #bospoli #mapoli

Jessamyn Jones @jessamynejones

No integrity in anything you do, Rachel. You are a hypocrite & liar. You testified at SchoolCommittee that your grandchild would be impacted by exam school policy. Now she goes to $59k private school, as did your own kids. Rich white progressives have no skin in the game #bospoli https://twitter.com/RachelPoliner/status/1558948721261518851

Reply on Twitter 1558962492310753280 Retweet on Twitter 1558962492310753280 Like on Twitter 1558962492310753280 Twitter 1558962492310753280
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
56m

#MassPolicyReport #NationalStoryDuJour: Surprise, surprise . . . the next pandemic has arrived.
#Massachusetts #MA #MApoli H/T @BlackMarzMedia https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/14/surprise-surprise-the-next-pandemic-has-arrived/

Reply on Twitter 1558962481908699137 Retweet on Twitter 1558962481908699137 Like on Twitter 1558962481908699137 Twitter 1558962481908699137
statehousenews State House News @statehousenews ·
1h

NEW: Gov. Baker plans 11 am presser Monday at the State Transportation Building in Boston to discuss details on the planned Orange Line closure. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1558959023763906563 Retweet on Twitter 1558959023763906563 Like on Twitter 1558959023763906563 4 Twitter 1558959023763906563
stevejones322 T Stephen Jones @stevejones322 ·
1h

$440 a month!? ☎️

Talking to family is priceless, but that phone bill is too high!
Families are counting on you to finish what you started, #MALeg @RonMariano @KarenSpilka! Pass #NoCostCalls without any pretrial detention expansion. Let's #KeepFamiliesConnected. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1558958557223165952 Retweet on Twitter 1558958557223165952 Like on Twitter 1558958557223165952 Twitter 1558958557223165952
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
1h

Inbox: Gov. Charlie Baker is holding a presser on the Orange Line shutdown tomorrow morning. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1558956104167612421 Retweet on Twitter 1558956104167612421 1 Like on Twitter 1558956104167612421 2 Twitter 1558956104167612421
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.