Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

At no time did Speaker DeLeo communicate with…

October 31, 2009 By justinian

“At no time did Speaker DeLeo communicate with Sal DiMasi, James Holzman, Richard Vitale, Reps. Rodrigues or Petrolati on the ticket broker bill,” says Seth Gitell, spokesman for Speaker DeLeo.

Only a few months into office, and DeLeo’s Gitell is scrambling to keep his boss from following in the footsteps of his three immediate predessors, all of whom were indicted.

Today’s Globe has the story.  Looks like prosecutors in the DiMasi case believe Rep. Tommy Petrolati was deeply involved in an illegal scheme to dodge the state’s lobbying rules and help a deep-pockets donor.

My belief is that the Speaker is clean.  But what will he do with this mess?  Meanwhile, will Petro be indicted? Will DiMasi turn on his former lieutenant to reduce his own legal exposure?  Will the people of Ludlow ever tire of Petro?  Will the Speaker drop Petro from his high leadership post?  Or is he a legislative champion who is just misunderstood?  BMGers: what say you?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: deleo, dimasi, petrolati

Comments

  1. christopher says

    October 31, 2009 at 10:53 am

    “At no time did the Speaker communicate…” raises red flags, just because there are too many variables.  I’m not accusing the Speaker of anything here; he may genuinely believe he is clean or even really be clean.  However, if you take “at NO time” too literally, one of his colleagues mentioned may say they actually do remember brief words exchanged in such a fleeting moment that the Speaker simply doesn’t remember the exchange.  I myself would be very careful about making such absolute statements, especially if under oath, lest I get contradicted by someone who has a better memory of the incident than I.  Also, why SHOULDN’T the Speaker communicate with colleagues about a particular bill?

    • somervilletom says

      October 31, 2009 at 12:13 pm

      From the piece:

      Petrolati has said he had limited involvement with the bill, and Rodrigues has said DiMasi never asked him to advance it.

      <

      p>Sadly, the piece does not cite links to the original statements of Mr. Petrolati and Mr. Rodrigues. I’ll post them when I get a chance to look myself.

      <

      p>Again, from the piece:

      As the bill was languishing in the Consumer Protection Committee in July 2007, the ruling says, Vitale alerted Holzman that DiMasi had spoken to Rodrigues, then-chairman of the Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure, about moving the legislation along. Rodrigues said Thursday that he did not remember any such conversation.

      Vitale also allegedly assured Holzman that he had Petrolati on the case “now on a daily basis.” Petrolati, a top DiMasi lieutenant who continues in that role under House Speaker Robert DeLeo, has denied through a lawyer doing anything to help the bill’s prospects. The lawyer, Jack St. Clair, said in June that Petrolati “played no integral role, other than to vote on the bill because it was good legislation.”

      <

      p>We are not talking about “fleeting moments”, we are talking about judge citing daily conversations with an unlicensed lobbyist in a criminal case.

      • christopher says

        October 31, 2009 at 12:44 pm

        I didn’t see anything about accepting bribes, so I’m not going to fault the politicians.  Maybe the lobbyist should be charged with failing to register and of course campaign contributions should be disclosed.  What I DON’T want to do is criminalize having conversations.  I’m sure you remember what I thought about the email “scandal” at Boston City Hall and this sounds vert familiar.

        • somervilletom says

          October 31, 2009 at 1:06 pm

          Perhaps I should put together a post that ties together the timeline, the players, and the topic.

          <

          p>The legislation in question pertains to ticket scalping, particularly for Fenway Park. Momentum was building (and perhaps still is, I don’t know, I don’t follow it) to decriminalize ticket scalping. The legislation in question purported to advance that aim — and in fact, served to increase the profit margins of certain organized ticket-scalpers and make it more, rather than less, difficult for regular folks who want to buy or sell a few extra seats for a game.

          <

          p>Was there outright bribery discussed in this piece? No, I didn’t see any either. If you investigate the issue, you’ll find however that the entire point of the legislation was to benefit the specific agencies paying the illegal lobbyists in question. Fortunately, it got nowhere in the Senate.

          <

          p>Learn about the players, learn about the roles of the legislators involved, and then ask again whether the behavior they demonstrated is consistent with the values we promote here.

          • christopher says

            October 31, 2009 at 1:39 pm

            It’s fine to debate the merits of and values behind the legislation.  I actually do not have a fully formed opinion on that at this point.  By all means point out the connections and shine light on who benefits and why.  I’d rather focus on the substance of the legislation than who said what to whom and when.

  2. peter-porcupine says

    October 31, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    …Rep. Petrolati was ALSO chair of the Redistricting Committee that was the end of Finneran.  And I THINK DeLeo has named him to reprise his role!

    <

    p>Talk about your Kiss of Death – Have Petro’s Help and Support!

  3. heartlanddem says

    October 31, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    You state

    My belief is that the Speaker is clean.

    Based upon what criteria?

    <

    p>You ask

    But what will he do with this mess?

    Vote NO on casinos.

    <

    p>You ponder

    Meanwhile, will Petro be indicted?

    For being a slippery politician – one could hope.

    <

    p>You query

    Will DiMasi turn on his former lieutenant to reduce his own legal exposure?

    Why not, unless TP has more goods on him? Petro would flip Sal in a heartbeat.

    <

    p>You demure

    Will the people of Ludlow ever tire of Petro?

    No. Ya gotta see it to believe it.

    <

    p>You seek

    Will the Speaker drop Petro from his high leadership post?

    If he has any sense and is clean as you suggest above.

    <

    p>You jest

    Or is he a legislative champion who is just misunderstood?

    BWWAAAAAAH!

  4. mcrd says

    October 31, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    Would anyone be surprised with that ceptic tank on Beacon Hill? Another house speaker on the way to the slammer? Who will the spotlight illuminate next? There must be one Republican who is a thief. We must be inclusive and celebrate diversity, The US attorney can’t just indict every democrat in the state. What would that say about democrats? That they are segregationists? Or just morally bankrupt thieves.

    • mark-bail says

      October 31, 2009 at 10:11 pm

      city boy. Unless you meant (ex)ceptic tank, in which case, when it comes to corruption, the Dems are no exception. Piss and moan all you like, but until you guys rub a couple of neurons together and come up with an idea that someone doesn’t laugh at and will vote for, you’ll be left with your snarks.

      <

      p>I don’t know how anyone looking at the information so far can believe that DiMasi’s innocent. I mean yeah, he’s innocent in a court of law so far, but I’m not a court of law, and even if he led on a couple of issues I cared about, I won’t be a patsy for the guy. He stinks. As Heartland Dem asks, on what evidence does one believe DiMasi’s innocent? Wishful thinking doesn’t count for much.

      <

      p>Peter Porcupine wonders when the people of Ludlow will tire of Tommy Petrolati. The answer is not soon. Ludlow loves their own. It will take serious consequences and a very brave challenger to take him on in his home town. There’s nothing happening on those fronts.

  5. cater68 says

    November 1, 2009 at 9:38 am

    What’s with the Globe putting juicy stories in its Saturday edition?  First, they print a story about the state cranking 60-some-odd million dollars into a floundering company called Evergreen – then they publish a story about a potentially widening corruption probe on Beacon Hill.

    <

    p>I commend them for great reporting, but the stories seem to be Sunday Globe calibur to me.  Whatever.  

    • mike-from-norwell says

      November 1, 2009 at 5:13 pm

      the Saturday paper has traditionally been the “bury the story” edition (which is also the reason that it is probably the most important edition to read).  Why do you think that Friday afternoon press conferences invariably are the most problematic?

      • cater68 says

        November 1, 2009 at 7:46 pm

        …was not a Friday afternoon news dump by the administration.  It was a well-researched and reported story about state government throwing good money after bad at a flimsy green company.  The Globe could’ve chosen to run it any day of the week – but they chose a Saturday.

        • mike-from-norwell says

          November 1, 2009 at 7:58 pm

          reread what you just said, and figure out what the Globe did with the story.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

massfiscal Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance @massfiscal ·
1h

As David Ismay famously said, the goal is to “break their will” and “turn the screws on” ordinary people. The ordinary people as the “person across the street” and the “senior on fixed income.”

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/21/science/following-dismal-global-climate-report-could-massachusetts-push-up-its-net-zero-goal/ #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1638503306342309891 Retweet on Twitter 1638503306342309891 1 Like on Twitter 1638503306342309891 4 Twitter 1638503306342309891
massclimate Massachusetts Climate Action Network @massclimate ·
1h

The #HousingCrisis & the #ClimateCrisis must be addressed together. We can no longer let our communities, particularly black & brown communities, be displaced by speculative investors buying up properties & jacking up rent.
@CityLife_Clvu #mapoli
https://www.wgbh.org/news/local-news/2023/03/21/evictions-in-boston-spike-over-last-year

Reply on Twitter 1638502456941334532 Retweet on Twitter 1638502456941334532 4 Like on Twitter 1638502456941334532 4 Twitter 1638502456941334532
lisakashinsky Lisa Kashinsky @lisakashinsky ·
1h

Morning, Mass. ☀️ Engagement is down across the #mapoli & #bospoli hashtags, new @LegislataApp data show. Is Twitter still useful for pols/activists? We asked @JonathanCohn & Boston Mayor @wutrain. Plus:
— Boston evictions spike
— Grappling w/climate goals https://politi.co/3yXRgkN

Reply on Twitter 1638499382571024386 Retweet on Twitter 1638499382571024386 6 Like on Twitter 1638499382571024386 6 Twitter 1638499382571024386
mapolinet mapoli.net @mapolinet ·
1h

Keller @ Large: Criminal charges could help Trump's presidential campaign, not hurt it #mapoli https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewIAjIE8ouk

Reply on Twitter 1638497935213166597 Retweet on Twitter 1638497935213166597 Like on Twitter 1638497935213166597 Twitter 1638497935213166597
lbsieger Lucy Bullock-Sieger 🇺🇸 @lbsieger ·
1h

We could improve our solar + farming (agrivoltaics) program and IX situation :) so we can actually get MWs in the ground while keeping farmers farming for another generation. #mapoli 1000MW+ of solar in the SMART program stalled in MA.

The Boston Globe @BostonGlobe

An alarming new report on climate change raises a difficult question for Massachusetts, already ahead of most states on climate policy. Is it even possible to move faster? https://trib.al/qHy7zwc

Reply on Twitter 1638497211326529537 Retweet on Twitter 1638497211326529537 1 Like on Twitter 1638497211326529537 1 Twitter 1638497211326529537
mysteriousrook Ed Lyons @mysteriousrook ·
2h

[Morpheus voice]
“What if I told you… this wasn’t a question of how liberal we are? 🙄 Or that what happens to literally five one-hundred-thousandths of a percent of the Earth’s surface area…. won’t matter for the planet’s mean surface temperature at all? #mapoli

Sabrina Shankman @shankman

On Monday, UN Sec-Gen. @antonioguterres said that in response to the dire IPCC report, developed nations should aim for net-zero by 2040. That's 10 years before MA's goal, so we asked the question: In liberal MA, is it even possible to move faster?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/21/science/following-dismal-global-climate-report-could-massachusetts-push-up-its-net-zero-goal/?event=event25

Reply on Twitter 1638496956333928453 Retweet on Twitter 1638496956333928453 Like on Twitter 1638496956333928453 Twitter 1638496956333928453
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.