Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Replacing Brown with a Progressive Dem… in the State House

March 9, 2010 By Ryan

On the show, we obviously hit on health care policy, but we also breached many subjects to make sure he’s not just a one-issue candidate. He talked about state house transparency, suggesting open meeting laws would cure a lot of problems. When asked about casinos (21:30), he said, “I think that resort casinos are a total false promise of revenue,” then hitting on how it would cannibalize small businesses, cultural institutions, the tourism industry, and increase social costs.

He’s strongly for a more graduated, progressive income tax, as opposed to relying on sales taxes, and those like it, which disproportionately burden blue collar and middle income workers. We hit on everything from jobs to education, so there’s a lot there and I hope you all enjoy it.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: 10, 2010, brown, campaigns, elections, leftahead, podcast, smulowitz, state-house, state-senate

Comments

  1. ms says

    March 9, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    I do not live in that area. But if I did, I would vote for Dr. Peter Smulowitz.

    <

    p>Why?

    <

    p>Because he is talking PROGRESSIVE on the income tax.

    <

    p>There is no where near enough state aid coming from Washington, DC.

    <

    p>This has to do with what are called “moderate” US senators.

    <

    p>They make sure that there is not nearly enough aid going to the states and people in this depression, all in the name of being “budget hawks”.

    <

    p>If Democratic state elected officials were more plain-spoken than they are, they would have voodoo dolls of these “moderate” US senators.

    <

    p>One of them, Blance Lincoln (D-AR) has a primary challenger from the left, Lt. Gov. Bill Halter (D-AR). THANK GOD.

    <

    p>Because of these realities, the least bad thing to do is to tax the wealthiest a little more to pay for what must be paid for.

    <

    p>As for casinos, I am mildly pro-casino. I am very skeptical of prohibiting whole lines of business. However, I believe that it should be STRICTLY regulated, and that there should be a union for the workers there, and perhaps there should be negotiations for local businesses to open “branch stores” in the casino complex.

    <

    p>However, if the candidate has a stand that I really favor on other matters, I would ignore the stand on casinos.

    <

    p>And, at this time, under these trying circumstances, progressive income taxation is very advisable.

    <

    p>And as for having a casino “in the area”, it may not make much difference, in a good or a bad way.

    <

    p>Why?

    <

    p>Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are ALREADY nearby.

    <

    p>The 3 Southern New England states have a VERY SMALL land area.

    • ryepower12 says

      March 9, 2010 at 11:22 pm

      I mentioned the casino issue because it’s important to me and thought he communicated the issue very, very well, but I don’t want to let it hijack the thread. If you’re curious about the issue, I highly suggest you check out some of the diaries on BMG about the topic or check out the many posts I’ve written on it at my blog.

    • sabutai says

      March 11, 2010 at 8:07 am

      …if this were Texas, residents would probably already consider Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun to be “nearby”.

  2. ed-poon says

    March 10, 2010 at 10:04 am

    • apricot says

      March 10, 2010 at 8:20 pm

      What’s your case against her?  

    • apricot says

      March 10, 2010 at 10:53 pm

      http://massachusetts-election-…

    • apricot says

      March 10, 2010 at 10:53 pm

      http://massachusetts-election-…

  3. trang73vu says

    March 10, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Progressives need to get behind a candidate who has walked the walk, not just talked the talk. Lida Harkins has done just that. She was a leader in the House during the fight for gay marriage and is a tireless fighter for public education. She has actually cast the hard votes for tax increases. When you spend a career building an impressive voting record on the issues that matter, you have earned the right to expect more from progressives. Don’t be so readily seduced by the new kid on the block.   

    • ryepower12 says

      March 10, 2010 at 7:39 pm

      is more than welcome on our show. If she has any representatives of her campaign reading this who could book the show, they should contact me. My email is available on my BMG profile.  

    • apricot says

      March 10, 2010 at 8:18 pm

      and there are different kinds of “experience”.

      <

      p>I feel like we all just had this argument during the primary for US Senate…

      <

      p>Experience in politics and the “cred” of greater name recognition led the day for Martha Coakley.  

      <

      p>I’m not so sure that served progressives or the Democrats or MA well.  

      <

      p>I give props to Harkins for solid service, but I’m not sure she’s the one to take the cause of more liberal progressive causes forward.

      <

      p>As I felt with Martha Coakley, I get the sense that Harkins is more “establishment” and settled, which has its history of past compromises and future indebtedness/in-the-box-‘that’s-the-way-we-always-do-things’ thinking.  “New” has its appeal, and it’s not always/only “just” “seduction”.  

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.