Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Stein campaign is a clarion call for clean elections

June 28, 2010 By empowerment

Finneran’s king-like rule over the Massachusetts Legislature was legendary, setting the stage for years of supplicant legislators fearful that crossing him and subsequent House Speakers might land them punishment in the form of basement offices, bad committee assignments, or marginalized hopes for influencing legislation. Those who did the Speaker’s dirty work were rewarded with lucrative committee chairmanships, legislative boondoggles for their home districts, and other tempting rewards. Finneran’s role in peddling influence in the State House should have landed him in jail but much of the corruption he was engaged in was perfectly legal. Yet it took the intervention of federal prosecutors in 2005 on a federal voting rights case to eventually land Finneran in disgrace as he plead guilty to one count of obstruction of justice, sparing him jail time.

But it was Finneran’s posturing against the voter-mandated Clean Elections Law that placed him right at the heart of the battle between special interests and the public interest. Voters who approved the measure by a 2-to-1 vote were stonewalled for years as Finneran, who called the law “welfare for politicians”, did everything in his power to stop the legislature from doing what it was legally required to do and appropriate money to fund Clean Elections candidates who met certain criteria to be eligible for Clean Elections funds. Finneran’s activism made him a target, and while the Supreme Judicial Court was willing to seize cars owned by the state’s lottery commission to raise funds for the law, they stopped short of honoring the plaintiff’s request that the SJC seize Finneran’s office furniture.

Make no mistake. This is not the story of one man sabotaging an otherwise functional democracy. This same State Legislature has had 3 house speakers in a row disgraced with federal indictments. This is the same legislature that has written itself out of the Open Meeting and Public Records laws, and typically enjoys 75% uncontested elections and 98% incumbent reelection rates. Massachusetts politics is rotten to its core, and whitewashing attempts like last year’s ethics reforms don’t even begin to address deep-rooted problems. The rhetoric of ethics, transparency, and responsibility ebbs and flows, but the corruption and influence-peddling continue apace.

But we don’t have to take this sitting down.

While Deval Patrick pays lip service to a green agenda — a people’s agenda — he continues to represent the interests of the well-connected few and heed their disproportionate guidance over the political process. Republican Charlie Baker and Independent Tim Cahill have shown even less interest in taking money out of politics. But there is one candidate who has refused to take money from corporate lobbyists or the executives who hire them, and she continues to point out the ways in which our government is being bought and paid for by big money interests.

Dr. Jill Stein, who was on the board of the Massachusetts Voters for Clean Elections, and came close to qualifying as a Clean Elections candidate in 2002, is running an inspired campaign to take back Beacon Hill in 2010. Her growing team is fueled by small grassroots donations, by volunteers, by Green-Rainbow Party activists, by independents and disaffected Democrats and Republicans alike. Alongside her campaign, her supporters have been assembling a grassroots fundraising mechanism to demonstrate what a clean elections campaign might look like.

So it was quite a shameful and fearful display by Finneran on June 16t when his WRKO-AM radio show “Tom & Todd” hosted the first broadcast debate in the governor’s race, and he refused to invite Dr. Stein to participate. What was Finneran afraid of? He was likely afraid that Stein would burst his status quo bubble, and was doing his part to keep her out of the story line.

With $750,000 available for public matching funds in Massachusetts this cycle, there’s a good chance that this election can become the tipping point for a permanent shift towards independent, clean-money politics. And that’s something that Tom Finneran spent most of his career trying to undermine. So it’s no surprise that his corporate-sponsored debate excluded one of his fiercest, most fearless, and most articulate opponents.

Now the ball is in our court. It’s up to us to build a clean money tidal wave that the corporate media can’t ignore, and that will get Jill’s message out through other more thoughtful channels.

Join us on Democracy Day — June 30th, 2010 — by making a $10 contribution to Jill Stein’s insurgent campaign for the corner office, and help us take back Beacon Hill so that it works for the people of the Commonwealth.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: 2010-ma-governor, clean-elections, democracy-day, independent-political-breakthrough, jill-stein, massachusetts

Comments

  1. pablo says

    June 28, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    This just in from Texas, where Rick (the Secessionist) Perry seems worried that a Democrat might oust him from the governor’s mansion. From the Dallas Morning News:

    Democrat Bill White says a Republican-financed petition drive to put the Green Party on the ballot means the GOP believes the governor’s race will be close. White faces Republican incumbent Rick Perry in November. An out-of-state Republican operative with ties to Perry’s political chief spearheaded a signature drive for the Green Party to field candidates in the fall. The effort cost $532,000 and was funded through a Missouri-based corporation with Republican ties. The actual source of the funding remains a mystery. Democrats believe the effort could benefit Perry if the liberal Green Party candidate draws votes from White. Democrats have filed suit, charging the petition drive was illegally funded with corporate money.

    In an interview Saturday, White said the GOP-backed Green Party effort “is a sign of desperation.” White said he expects to get votes from some Republicans as well as Democrats and independents. And he said the fact that Perry allies worked to put a Green Party candidate on the ballot to siphon votes suggests, “the Republicans know they have a problem.”

    • empowerment says

      June 29, 2010 at 11:12 am

      While the Democratic Party has engaged in countless efforts to restrict ballot access, to smash Clean Elections in MA, to slurp down lobbyist money and corporate money, and to back big business at every turn. The Republicans may be worse… but the Greens are simply in another class.

      <

      p>According to the Wall Street Journal article on the Texas mess, Christina Tobin, Libertarian candidate for Secretary of State in California, and her group Free and Equal, were paid to get the Greens on the ballot. Tobin has been an outspoken advocate for fair ballot access for all candidates, and was instrumental in Ralph Nader’s ballot access successes in 2008.

      But more to the point, the Green-Rainbow Party in Massachusetts has continually fought against the influence of money over our political system. And the fact is that the only candidate in the gubernatorial race who is refusing to take money from corporate lobbyists and the executives who hire them is Jill Stein. Meanwhile, Governor Patrick’s major fundraiser is Sean Curran,  a lobbyist with business before the state. Patrick talks a good talk much of the time, with one example touting “ethics reform” in the State House. But as I write here, if you scratch the surface of what he’s actually doing, you realize he’s not dealing with the most fundamental challenges we have to healthy, transparent, government of, by, and for the people. If you’d like to get there, Stein’s campaign and the Green-Rainbow Party are the best vehicles to make it happen.

  2. pablo says

    June 28, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    Here’s more Green Party love from the far right, courtesy of TPM

    GOP Donors Funded Entire PA Green Party Drive
    By Paul Kiel – August 2, 2006, 4:00PM

    OK, we’ve done it. We’ve nailed it down: Every single contributor to the Pennsylvania Green Party Senate candidate is actually a conservative — except for the candidate himself.

    The Luzerne County Green Party raised $66,000 in the month of June in order to fund a voter signature drive. The Philly Inquirer reported yesterday that $40,000 came from supporters of Rick Santorum’s campaign (or their housemates). Also yesterday, we confirmed that another $15,000 came from GOP donors and conservatives. Only three contributions, totaling $11,000, remained as possible legit donations.

    Today, I confirmed that those came from GOP sources.

    – The Green Party listed a $1,000 check from a Bill Wickerman of Covington & Burling. There is no such person. However, a Bill Wichterman works there. He’s a Republican lobbyist who has also given to Santorum this campaign.

    – James Holman, who in the past has supported GOP House candidate Howard Kaloogian, Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS), and Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ), was incorrectly listed by the Greens as “James Howmen.” He disclosed that he was an editor at the San Diego Reader; a James Holman is the publisher there.

    – The Green Party disclosed that a “Franklin Schoneman” of Pottsville, Pa. gave $5,000. A “Franklin Schoeneman” of Pottsville has given $8,000 to Santorum so far this election.

    That leaves only one contribution, for $30, as a legitimate donation from a Green Party supporter. That came from the candidate himself, Carl Romanelli. He made it to his own campaign fund, not the local Green Party.

    Romanelli’s latest FEC report shows his campaign currently has $17.20 on hand.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.