Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Is it time?: Vermont going single payer

January 27, 2011 By metoo

Newly elected Vermont Governor Shumelin is moving the state towards single payer.  He formed a consulting group headed by Dr. William Hsaio, chief designer of the Taiwan health plan.  The latter runs at a cost of 6% of GNP and covers 99% of the population.  The Vermont legislature seems on board to inch towards making Single Payer happen.  It will still be a tough slog.

Like the birth of the Canadian system, Vermont has the chance to be the laboratory for the nation on whether Single Payer will provide a solution to soaring health care costs or not.  It is already past time to start this experiment.

Naturally there will be interference from large institutional players.  It is important to spotlight this serious effort by the Green Mountain State and show appropriate outside support to let it play out.  It will be formulated and shaped by the people of Vermont who are facing unsustainable health costs. Dr. Hsaio has predicted from his data that health care expenses will bankrupt the state within 5 years if something is not done.

As many interested eyes as possible should be directed at their efforts so it plays out in the open. Undue negative influence from those who have chosen to be part of the problem instead of the solution need to be asked to step aside.

The story from Vermont newspapers is presented here and here.  Spread the word!

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: dr.-william-hsaio, governor-shumelin, single-payer, vermont

Comments

  1. mannygoldstein says

    January 27, 2011 at 11:39 pm

    The US pays about 17% of GDP for health care.  No other country on earth pays much more than 10%.  So moving to a health insurance system that looks something like that found in other countries should reap tremendous savings.

    <

    p>These savings should translate into lower costs for employers, and this should be a big draw.  For example, my company employs several hundred factory workers, and they all get health insurance.  For hourly factory worker jobs, health insurance is an enormous portion of total compensation (i.e., cost).  Companies with these types of workers should save a fortune by moving to a state with world-class health insurance.

    <

    p>So, beyond doing good for its residents, Vermont will be doing good for its economy.

    • medfieldbluebob says

      January 28, 2011 at 3:48 pm

      It’s going to be  few years before we get the cost savings. This is about health insurance. The costs are largely in the healthcare system. The whole way we practice and deliver medicine in this country need to change.

      <

      p>But, you’re right. This will start the ball rolling in a different direction, and generating those cost savings.

      <

      p>Change may not get us what we want. But NOT changing definitely won’t.

      • metoo says

        January 29, 2011 at 8:17 am

        If you look at other countries that have gone Single Payer the main difference is administrative costs.  Our country matches the payout for medical services in other countries.  Further a more efficient way of paying for care will allow more rational distribution of services.

        • daves says

          January 29, 2011 at 4:38 pm

          These other countries pay far less for health care, deliver health care differently, and pay for it differently.  

          • metoo says

            January 30, 2011 at 7:59 am

            Try this article on for size.

            • stomv says

              January 30, 2011 at 8:57 am

              but they’re not the whole bag.  It turns out that if you’ve got single payer, the budgetary value of public health policy changes dramatically.  The bigger a portion of the medical bills picked up by the gov’t (and the more transparent this is), the better for the budget every smoking secession program, every walk to school program, every AA meeting, every sales-tax-exemption-removal of candy bars, every reduction in air pollution emitted by power plants, etc.

              <

              p>You’re free to argue that these sorts of government interventions are appropriate or inappropriate, but surely you see that the budgetary incentive for these programs grows as the feds pay more of the health care pie, and surely you also agree that, especially in times of tight budgets, there is tremendous pressure to find cost savings.

            • daves says

              January 30, 2011 at 10:09 am

              For the major private insurers in this state, administrative costs plus contribution to surplus is about 10-15% of premium.  Medicare spends about 6-7%, between the direct cost of government employees and private contractors.  Saving the difference would be big, but it does not account for the even half of the total difference in health spending on a per capita basis.    

              • metoo says

                January 30, 2011 at 6:29 pm

                again

  2. janalfi says

    January 28, 2011 at 12:16 am

    Resolution Calling to Amend the Constitution Banning Corporate Personhood Introduced in Vermont

    <

    p>

    In Vermont, state senator Virginia Lyons on Friday  presented an anti-corporate personhood resolution for passage in the Vermont legislature. The resolution, the first of its kind, proposes “an amendment to the United States Constitution … which provides that corporations are not persons under the laws of the United States.”  Sources in the state house say it has a good chance of passing.

    <

    p>Go, Vermont!!!!  

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.