We should be plain that not all the brains behind those millions of lonely eyes will be receptive of such inspiration and transformation. We are not, for example, likely to hear widespread support in Congress for either turning down sensational and hateful oratory.
To worry the metaphor a bit, Obama is indeed like Joe DiMaggio in Mrs. Robinson. Tonight, he’s effectively the slugger standing at home plate. In theory, he could hit that needed run, but he’s on his own.
Alas, personal responsibility is a delusional trait of too many of us. Like we are prone to say we are people persons or multitaskers, we boast of accepting consequences for our mistakes and demand, demand as a result, that others do the same.
This has been astoundingly clear in the past few days, particularly but not exclusively, on the far right and the muddled outer circles such as Tea Party groupies. As with our Left Ahead caller yesterday, the chant is that lefties are lying about righties claiming their years of inflammatory calls for violence drove the acts of Tucson shooter, Jared Loughner. Even those in Congress and the Administration who say this horror should remind us that even if there is no direct link, we’d be better off as a nation if we forwent insurrection and shoot-’em talk are getting slammed.
I noticed one such clear example today on the Washington Post’s op-ed page. There Charles Krauthammer set up and destroyed his strawmen. His repetition that Loughner is crazy and that’s all there is to it avoids the underlying issues we progressives are wont to identify.
Likewise, Sara Palin has a long piece in video and text on her Facebook page. (Link goes to text, which in turn has a link to the 8-minute video.) It is similarly defensive. She decries any call to crank down the volume and vitriol with such remarks as, “Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions.”
Yes to Debate
She too defines Loughner as simply crazed – “…this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal…” Her very defensive point is actually aimed at cutting off public debate, as in claiming any connection of the slightest of violent talk to violent action.
Instead and regardless of the proximate motivations for Loughner’s rampage, we do need to debate this.
Many of the most extreme won’t want to consider calls to reason and civility. Some are simply self-interested; think of TV and radio talkers who attract listeners and advertisers through quotable, aggressive insults and threats. Others are just too literal; when a Loughner kills people, it’s just him and we needn’t worry our pretty little heads about anything beyond the obvious. Still others are understandably defensive; they like talk of revolution, even violently, and can’t bear to think they may contribute to actual blood in the parking lot.
The lonely eyes and uncomforted ears will turn to our President tonight. This should be a seminal speech and may be the most important one he has given. Even setting aside the minority who can’t or won’t let themselves consider his thoughts and intentions, a huge majority is ready for inspiration and direction.
Cross-post: This appears also at Marry in Massachusetts.
2. He’s decisive in excoriating anyone to the left of him.
3. He’s decisive about protecting all lawlessness practiced by the Right.
<
p>I genuinely think he believes that he’s not been nice enough to the Right, and he’s redoubling his efforts to please them.
<
p>I expect Obama will use this as an opportunity for false equivalences wrapped in beautiful words that are ultimately vague and go nowhere.
<
p>Hopefully I’m totally wrong.
I hope you’re wrong this time. On occasion, Obama has shown charisma and inspirational power. This is his shot.
I hate it.
Clinton also seemed to crave popularilty and avoided confrontation often with the right (though he did force a shutdown, so maybe there’s hope that Obama will find his spine in the face of GOP House).
<
p>Republicans seem to more pride themselves on the attitude of you may not agree with me, but you know where I stand. Ironically it was CLinton who pointed out that Americans often prefer strong and wrong to weak and right.
I do like what this guy says about it though.
http://www.infowars.com/is-gif…
how about an historian on our national history of political violence – here. He suggests owning the culture instead of pretending these frequent murders are anomalies.
His remarks were well received by the audience.
I concur and posted on it this morning.