Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Thank you Boston Herald and Lowell Sun!

February 8, 2011 By AmberPaw 16 Comments

Governor Patrick’s proposal to dismantle the Committee for Public Counsel Services (CPCS) and move the constitutionally mandated defense of indigent Massachusetts residents into the executive branch is poorly thought out.  This proposal is at least a moral violation of the separation of powers conceived by John Adams.  John Adams developed the doctrine of separation of powers to protect the ordinary citizen against abuses of power by an over-strong executive such as King George.  If Governor Patrick consolidates everything he is seeking to consolidate into the executive, the Judicial branch will be eviscerated and judicial independence and separation of powers will become a sham and a mere illusion.

Further, the proposal does not address the civil cases, or the reason that civil case costs which were once about 1/2 are now about 1/5.  Hint – Commissioner Angelo McClain is doing something right in reducing case load.  It is DCF case load that drives the cost of representation pursuant to G.L.c.119 – not attorneys!

Legislation via the budget is a throwback, and not the kind of thoughtful, progressive, compassionate approach I expected from Governor Deval Patrick.

The reality is that those attorneys such as myself who make indigent defense part of their practice float loans to the commonwealth, and will never cost the taxpayer a pension.  The proposal by Patrick underestimates, minimizes, and does not shed true light and air on the real cost and perhaps – not on the real reason for his proposal.

Further, many attorneys would have to layoff staff if their income decreases suddenly.  My own “ballpark estimate” is that if Governor Patrick’s proposal is enacted, it will lead to a loss of at least 1000 private jobs and as many as 500 bankruptcies.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: boston-globe, boston-herald, committee-for-public-counsel-serviuces, compassion, cpcs, gov.-patrick, indigent-defense, lowell-sun

Comments

  1. jimc says

    February 9, 2011 at 12:08 pm

    Amber, I hate to quibble with such a good post, but you link (twice) to a Globe letter to the editor, but present it as the Globe’s point of view. Maybe you meant to link to something else?

    <

    p>Also, I’m missing the governor’s rationale for this. What benefit is there to the administration in his proposal? Better put, what is the benefit to the public?

    <

    p>

    Log in to Reply
  2. amberpaw says

    February 9, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    I know I linked to DA O’Keefe’s letter, not sure which link you mean?  I intended to link to the Globe’s editorial of yesterday which, I think, shows basic ignorance of indigent defense and reliance on a faulty, biased, incomplete data-set possibly supplied by the lobbyists for the DA association.  There are plenty of former  assistant DAs in the administration, after all.

    Log in to Reply
  3. sabutai says

    February 9, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    Your comment spurred a question, Deb — can anyone recall a major issue where the Globe has not agreed with Patrick?  Taxes, gambling, education, this, they’re all on the same page.  What am I forgetting?

    Log in to Reply
    • christopher says

      February 9, 2011 at 8:54 pm

      …and I don’t know enough to comment there, it begs the question as to whether the Globe follows Patrick or Patrick the Globe, and if the latter does the Governor feel the Globe has so much sway that he needs to follow them politically?

      Log in to Reply
      • sabutai says

        February 10, 2011 at 2:44 pm

        Deval’s Commissioner of Education openly stated in an email that they need to keep the Globe on their side.

        Log in to Reply
        • christopher says

          February 10, 2011 at 11:08 pm

          Log in to Reply
          • sabutai says

            February 11, 2011 at 6:40 pm

            From the Gloucester scam:

            The Reville e-mail, which was sent at 11:54 p.m., on Feb. 5, 2009, argued that the Patrick administration essentially needed approval of one of the three applications – along with Gloucester, there were pending charter plans for Waltham and Worcester – to avoid alienating “key moderate allies like (The Boston) Globe and the Boston Foundation.”

            Log in to Reply
  4. dave-from-hvad says

    February 10, 2011 at 9:56 am

    is arguing that he will save money by replacing state employees in developmental centers for the intellectually disabled with private-vendor employees, and yet will also save money by replacing private attorneys serving as public defenders with state employees?  

    Log in to Reply
    • fka-wahoowa says

      February 11, 2011 at 3:08 pm

      Regardless of how you feel about the issue, the comparison isn’t apt.  It’s really an apples and oranges comparison.

      <

      p>It’s all about the way the folks in the current system are paid and how they would be paid in the new system.  With the move from private attorneys to state employees, rather than paying on a per hour basis, you are paying a fixed salary.

      <

      p>Private attorneys charge for their time and charge for everything associated with their work.  So if it takes an hour for a lawyer to travel from their office to a hearing, they bill for that hour.  And then for the hour to go back to the office after the hearing.  So the cost of the travel is $100 or $200 to the state (depending on the type of trial).  If that same lawyer works for the state (or is otherwise a salaried employe), the cost of that travel is zero.

      <

      p>At it’s heart, this is really almost an argument about legal fee models that you are also seeing in the private world.  Should lawyers bill hourly or should they a fee for a project?  Or, in this case, should private lawyers be used or should this be taken up by state employees.  

      Log in to Reply
      • centralmassdad says

        February 11, 2011 at 4:06 pm

        A private, by-the-hour client, yes.  But appointed attorneys aren’t compensated in this way.

        Log in to Reply
        • fka-wahoowa says

          February 11, 2011 at 6:36 pm

          But I think appointed attorney are paid this way.  I think they get $50 an hour for non-murder cases and $100 an hour for murder cases.  Isn’t that what Amberpaw is saying when she waits for four hours and only gets paid for two?

          Log in to Reply
          • amberpaw says

            February 11, 2011 at 9:54 pm

            If you are waiting for one case for four hours, at $50.00 an hour, you get paid for one hour.  It is true that defending parents and representing children, the parts of it that are billable (and one can only bill for the items listed in the assigned counsel manual, which are NOT all that a diligent attorney actually does).  If you are waiting four hours for two cases, then you can bill one hour per case.  But even if you are waiting six hours for three cases, the maximum is two billable hours wait time.  True, a staff attorney could sit there and knit for six hours and be paid for all six, no matter what, while waiting.  Why is that an improvement?

            Log in to Reply
          • centralmassdad says

            February 12, 2011 at 1:07 pm

            hours billed doesn’t correspond to hours worked, at all.

            <

            p>Every hour you sit waiting is an hour you’re not working on something else, which means you are getting paid zero.

            <

            p>Amberpaw poits out the details of the limited pay for wait time, but doesn’t mention that the courts think nothing of having attorneys wait for hours.

            <

            p>In some counties, the superior court judges have a 2:00PM motion list.  The clerk doesn’t even come out to see who is there until 2:30, and they don’t start until 3:00.  Anyone who is not first on the list wastes most of their day, which is why private clients wind up paying $1200 for a 4 minute, uncontested hearing.

            <

            p>Attorneys who do state paid appointment work spend their whole day, and get paid bupkes.  It is as if your employer tells you to report to Brattleboro, VT at 9:00 AM for work, and maybe they’ll have something for you to do sometime between 9:00 and 1:00PM.  So you schlep all the way up there, sit there picking your ear for four hours, and then then they tell you to come back tomorrow.  And by the way, even though you spent 8 hours today doing what they told you to do, they aren’t paying you, and the nerve of you, you greedy parasitic pig, for seeking payment when you didn’t even do any work.

            <

            p>O’Keefe is a disgrace to the profession.

            Log in to Reply
      • amberpaw says

        February 11, 2011 at 9:50 pm

        Attorneys work in their own counties.  They are not able to bill for travel for the first hour or first 30 miles no matter how long the travel takes.  The standards of practice make that clear, see the Assigned Counsel Manual  Similarly, if an attorney waits four hours for a case to be called, currently, that attorney may bill for one hour.  Just to clear that error up!

        <

        p>Further, the real cost of an employee is far more than salary.  That all being said, my belief is that the only way Gov.Patrick’s proposal could even possibly save money is to rack up caseloads so high that little or no actual defense would occur.

        <

        p>fka – how familiar are you with Care and Protection cases, and how they work?  Want to know more?  As it happens, I care about due process, the constitution, and know full well that I do pro bono work with every civil case appointment I accept and float a loan to this state by waiting to be paid and covering all my own overhead for the state’s cases, made possible by the private clients who also seek my services for both trial level and appellate level representation.

        <

        p>I see this debate as really being about whether or not there is a commitment to the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of Massachusetts, access to justice, and due process, myself.

        Log in to Reply
        • fka-wahoowa says

          February 12, 2011 at 10:31 am

          Hey AmberPaw, thanks for the info.

          <

          p>I’m actually not decided how I feel on this issue one way or the other.  But I do find the larger debate in the legal world about billing methods interesting.

          <

          p>So my question…and this is largely thinking out loud here…is whether there is a way to save money and keep private attorneys involved by moving to a fixed fee system.  Basically pay a set stipend per case rather than for allowing hourly billing.

          <

          p>As someone on the fence on this issue, I will be honest about a couple of your points that don’t really do much for me.  With regard to your loan concept, that’s pretty much true with private clients as well.  When I was an attorney doing deal work, our bill wasn’t paid until the deal closed (or died for good), which could be a process that took months or longer.  And many lawyers who work on the plaintiff’s side of litigation only get paid IF they are victorious and that payment comes when the client gets paid.  So a lot of lawyers are essentially floating a loan to their clients.  That’s how the business works.

          <

          p>Your due process argument rings slightly hallow to me as well.  I’m also not convinved that private lawyers make better advocates than state employees.  We know there are bad lawyers out there.  I imagine there are some lawyers taking these appointments because they can’t get other paying clients, not because of their belief in due process.    

          Log in to Reply
          • amberpaw says

            February 12, 2011 at 10:26 pm

            That each case is so different.  I will remind you, again, that I don’t do criminal work.  I also have a thriving family law practice of which the care and protection work is just a part.  Also, Care and Protection cases do not involve DAs, though they do involve an executive agency and require at least an attorney for a child, a mother and a father (and sometimes two fathers, or for kids with different positions who need separate attorneys to avoid conflicts)  These are very complex cases that often go on for years and at least for these, flat fees would be a hardship.  No way to avoid “conflict counsel” in these cases, either.

            <

            p>What I do as a private lawyer is if I get busy beyond a certain point, I can close intake, and not take any more cases – either private or appointed, and keep my quality up.  If you are a staff attorney, you cannot do that – and a major problem with the “all staff” model the only way to be economical is to have crushing case loads.  See, for example:   http://datageek.freedombloggin… which lists case load limits.  The Governor’s proposal would require, with 280,000 cases a year, at least 200 cases per public defender in his all staff proposal.  Not good.

            Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)

Recent User Posts

Zero Net Energy – August 2022

August 18, 2022 By gmoke Leave a Comment

Liz

August 17, 2022 By johntmay 5 Comments

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 12 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Recent Comments

  • jconway on LizTake it from an expert, third parties are doomed to fail…
  • jconway on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesPost the interview online and let voters judge for thems…
  • johntmay on LizAs the news of Mar-a-Lago unfolds, and the economy impro…
  • johntmay on Liz“the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Kautilya, the Hind…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesAs I've said several times already, the commentary on th…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI was on the interview with Rep Vitolo. He was outwardly…
  • Keith Bernard on LizFirst of all, gross. While I appreciate Ms. Cheney's cou…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

lowellcouncilor Darius Mitchell_ Massachusetts Governor 2022 🇺🇸 @lowellcouncilor ·
1h

THE LAST WEEK TO REGISTER TO VOTE 🗳 FOR MASSACHUSETTS SEPTEMBER 6TH PRIMARY!

#MAPOLI #BOSPOLI #NHPOLITICS

Reply on Twitter 1560758200319807489 Retweet on Twitter 1560758200319807489 Like on Twitter 1560758200319807489 Twitter 1560758200319807489
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
1h

New report shows Massachusetts among worst states for renters – Spectrum News https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/19/new-report-shows-massachusetts-among-worst-states-for-renters-spectrum-news/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1560757634419924992 Retweet on Twitter 1560757634419924992 Like on Twitter 1560757634419924992 Twitter 1560757634419924992
timocity Tim Ney @timocity ·
1h

We don’t have the luxury of time to go through anything like a planning process -@jfh

https://www.governing.com/now/how-boston-area-officials-are-responding-to-transit-turmoil #MBTA #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1560756222189617153 Retweet on Twitter 1560756222189617153 Like on Twitter 1560756222189617153 Twitter 1560756222189617153
chrisforma Chris Doughty @chrisforma ·
1h

4x8 lawn signs are popping up across the state! Get yours today at https://chrisforma.com/lawn-signs #mapoli #magov

3

Reply on Twitter 1560755993893535744 Retweet on Twitter 1560755993893535744 Like on Twitter 1560755993893535744 4 Twitter 1560755993893535744
aarash19 Robert J Braecklein @aarash19 ·
1h

I will write articles in 24hours on̖ #nfts, #crypto, #blockchain #metaverse, #defi, #web3, dao 😀
#financialassistance #mapoli #bospoli #teamtuesday #culture #team #trust #kintent

👉👉https://go.fiverr.com/visit/?bta=169592&brand=fiverrcpa&afp=random-hashtag&afp1=mariadiandra/rewrite-and-transform-your-plagiarized-content&landingPage=https://www.fiverr.com/mariadiandra/rewrite-and-transform-your-plagiarized-content&t=1660947918

Reply on Twitter 1560754807799185408 Retweet on Twitter 1560754807799185408 Like on Twitter 1560754807799185408 Twitter 1560754807799185408
creaturewise courtney meinders @creaturewise ·
1h

5 Steps To Start Your #Dropshipping Business For Passive Income̍.

🤝
#debt #fba #mapoli #kindnesswithmarcus #mtgarena #mtgexplorer #harleyquinns3 #jobwithbenefits

👉👉https://go.fiverr.com/visit/?bta=169592&brand=fiverrcpa&afp=random-hashtag&afp1=stores/dropshipping&landingPage=https://www.fiverr.com/stores/dropshipping&t=1660947874

Reply on Twitter 1560754622360592385 Retweet on Twitter 1560754622360592385 Like on Twitter 1560754622360592385 Twitter 1560754622360592385
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.