During an interview with CNN on Monday, US Senator Scott Brown described the marriage rights of same-sex couples as “settled law” in Massachusetts and dismissed ongoing debate on the issue by saying that Bay State voters have “moved on.”
MassEquality Executive Director Kara Suffredini issued the following statement in response:
“With all due respect to US Sen. Scott Brown, the LGBT community in Massachusetts has not ‘moved on’ from the marriage debate because, frankly, it can’t. Marriages of same-sex couples in Massachusetts are still not recognized by the federal government because of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. In addition to being immoral, this inequality means that married same-sex couples do not have access to many of the safety nets afforded other married couples: social security survivor benefits; Medicaid long-term care benefits; spousal veteran benefits; or rights of inheritance. Bay State voters believe that these families are equally deserving of federal recognition, and they won’t ‘move on’ until all Massachusetts families are treated equally.
“It is convenient for Sen. Brown, who voted four times against equal marriage for same-sex couples when he was a state senator, to encourage voters to look elsewhere when it comes to fairness and equality on this issue. Sen. Brown asserts that marriage rights are a local issue that should be decided without interference from the federal government. However, this position is at odds with a vote he took as recently as 2010, when he voted in favor of a referendum that would have overturned marriage equality in the District of Columbia.
“Sen. Brown is correct, though, when he says that Massachusetts voters care about the economy and taxes. This is especially true for married same-sex couples who live in a two-tiered system that negatively impacts their economic security, and forces many of them to pay higher taxes than their heterosexual counterparts. We encourage Sen. Brown to catch up with Bay State voters and join every other is member of the Massachusetts Congressional delegation in signing on to the Respect for Marriage Act, which would remedy this blatant inequality.”
and Richard Tisei probably won’t get many as well. So no sense annoying people he needs help from just to try to please people who aren’t voting for him anyway.
no sense in doing something just because it’s the right thing to do. I mean, what would be the point of that?
obviously, but it seems squarely aimed at the sensibilities of voters who are uncomfortable with gender-equality issues and want to be told we’ve moved on.
-When you’re married, but have to check off and file your taxes as “single” every year, because DOMA prevents the IRS from recognizing that fact.
-When your marriage is not recognized in most other states.
-When your defined-benefit pension would be inheritable by an opposite-sex spouse, but not a same-sex spouse.
-When being covered on your spouse’s health plan creates a tax liability.
-When you can’t count in your Senator to support your rights – it’s anyone’s guess where he’ll be on issues that affect you.
and if you lose it’s even dumber.
Warren and Brown are working on motivating the troops and ramping up the donors to battle for about 10% or less in the middle or uninformed. I bet none of them care about this issue.
I guess I am just tired of pointless “demands” for Brown to do this or that.
is beholden only to his consultants.
Brown the Senator is beholden to all residents of Massachusetts, be they voters for him or not, voters at all or not, 18+ or not, citizens or not, permanently in MA or just here for a few months or years.
try being divoriced with children and see how that works out for you. you pay way more that the cost of upkeep, post-tax, and sometimes you can’t even claim the exemption.