Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

New Jersey Marriage Equality Advocates Are Heading Back to Court

July 1, 2013 By Laurel

New Jersey Supreme Court

Advocates for same-sex marriage in New Jersey are heading back to court on Wednesday in an effort to invalidate New Jersey’s discriminatory heterosexuals-only marriage law.

New Jersey doesn’t allow same-sex couples to marry, but rather shunts them into civil unions. A civil unions law was passed by the New Jersey legislature in 2006 in response to the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in the Lewis v. Harris case, which said:

With this State’s legislative and judicial commitment to eradicating sexual orientation discrimination as our backdrop, we now hold that denying rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1. To comply with this constitutional mandate, the Legislature must either amend the marriage statutes to include same-sex couples or create a parallel statutory structure, which will provide for, on equal terms, the rights and benefits enjoyed and burdens and obligations borne by married couples. We will not presume that a separate statutory scheme, which uses a title other than marriage, contravenes equal protection principles, so long as the rights and benefits of civil marriage are made equally available to same-sex couples. [emphasis added]

The court was clearly mandating that if same-sex couples were forced into a separate marriage-like institution, that institution had to provide them with the same rights and benefits that heterosexual couples receive from civil marriage.

The US Supreme Court’s invalidation of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) last week made the NJ Supreme Court’s equality mandate impossible to fulfill for New Jersey’s same-sex couples in civil unions. This is because the federal government only recognizes marriages, not civil unions. With the DOMA decision, married same-sex couples may now access the more than 1,100 federal benefits and protections that DOMA previously denied them. Couples in civil unions may access nothing.

“The demise of DOMA Section 3 means that New Jersey’s marriage discrimination is all that bars same-sex couples and their families from the full range of federal rights, benefits, and protections. With this new legal landscape, New Jersey’s same-sex couples and their children need swift action,” said Hayley Gorenberg, Lambda Legal Deputy Legal Director, in a press release. “In Lambda Legal’s original New Jersey marriage case, Lewis v. Harris, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that it is unconstitutional to give same-sex couples lesser rights than different-sex couples. In 2013, after the defeat of DOMA, there is nothing left to debate – couples in civil unions are not being treated equally under the law.”

On Wednesday Lambda Legal plans to file a motion for summary judgment in the case Garden State Equality, et al. v. Dow, et al. which was already asking the New Jersey Supreme Court “to intercede and order marriage to secure compliance with its original mandate of equality for the Lewis v. Harris plaintiffs alleging that civil unions were failing to provide legal equality even before the DOMA decision”.

Oral arguments will be held on August 15, the Washington Post reports.

With the exception of New Jersey, every northeastern state that had civil unions has since adopted marriage equality laws. These include Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware and Maryland as well as the District of Columbia.

Related: States With Civil Unions Are Depriving Gay Couples Of Federal Marriage Benefits

Cross-posted at Justice For All.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: doma, marriage-equality, new-jersey

Comments

  1. mike_cote says

    July 1, 2013 at 3:21 pm

    New Jersey had the chance to do the right thing, but because of Governor Tea Party Idiot, now they have to use the courts. I hope this is the final nail in the coffin of him becoming the Tea Party nominee for President.

    • Laurel says

      July 1, 2013 at 4:12 pm

      I wonder if Christie will get the same kind of backlash from the radical-right that Romney got in MA. Despite working personally to get the anti-gay constitutional amendment passed, Romney got vilified by the base of the base for abiding by the legal outcome. Christie is ripe for the same kind of treatment from the very people he hopes to get favor for right now by not facilitating the override of his veto on the marriage equality bill.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

brianna_asavage Brianna Aloisio Savage @brianna_asavage ·
48m

Alongside YW Boston, I am grateful for Rep Nguyen, Rep Shand, and Sen Miranda's leadership on #ParityonBoard, filed this month! #ParityonBoard #mapoli #equity #representationmatters https://lnkd.in/efxNCWAk

Reply on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Retweet on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Like on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Twitter 1620117417677524993
homesforallmass Homes for All Massachusetts @homesforallmass ·
49m

“A group approx. 25 Lynn activists drove to Boston Sat morning, where they rallied outside the State House — alongside dozens of housing justice advocates, labor union leaders and tenants — in support of a legislative rent control package.” https://www.itemlive.com/2023/01/29/lynn-activists-rally-for-rent-control/ #MApoli

Reply on Twitter 1620117240896163841 Retweet on Twitter 1620117240896163841 1 Like on Twitter 1620117240896163841 1 Twitter 1620117240896163841
andreabaldy55 Andrea Baldwin @andreabaldy55 ·
49m

Too funny @massgop #mapoli #DumpJimLyons

Kenneth Glennon @kennethglenn06

Jim Jones Lyons @JimLyonsMA team of Spaceballs are running out of time to further take the @massgop from suck to blow! Don't get your Schwartz twisted, Lyons, Door-Dash Diehl and Motormouth McMahon are preparing to jump to LUDICROUS speed to finish the job! #DumpJimLyons #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Retweet on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Like on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Twitter 1620117094988931073
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
57m

"We are taking every single precaution and really sparing no expense to ensure that both patients and providers can feel safe, that their personal information will not be shared." #mapoli https://www.masslive.com/politics/2023/01/mass-launches-abortion-legal-hotline-in-new-push-to-defend-reproductive-care.html

Reply on Twitter 1620115202388955137 Retweet on Twitter 1620115202388955137 Like on Twitter 1620115202388955137 1 Twitter 1620115202388955137
bncordeiro Brock N. Cordeiro @bncordeiro ·
1h

Rep. Rodney Elliott of the 16th Middlesex district is the newest cosponsor (34th) of An Act to reduce incidence & death from #PancreaticCancer (House Docket #393/Senate Docket #264) THANK YOU! #magov #mapoli @ACSCANMA @PanCANBoston @PanCAN @letswinpc @lustgartenfdn @worldpcc

Reply on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Retweet on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Like on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Twitter 1620114111085559810
prof_eob Dr. Erin O'Brien @prof_eob ·
1h

Compared to state leg districts in MA, districts in other New England states have higher likelihoods of women running for office:
- 108% higher likelihood for Connecticut
- 183% for Maine
- 412% for New Hampshire
- 90% for Rhode Island
- 314% for Vermont

#mapoli #NEpoli

Reply on Twitter 1620113407197446145 Retweet on Twitter 1620113407197446145 Like on Twitter 1620113407197446145 1 Twitter 1620113407197446145
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.