Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Is it for real?

September 9, 2013 By Donald Green 14 Comments

The front pages of major media are reporting that Russia, V. Putin, has asked Assad to coalesce his Chemical Weapons and have them destroyed by UN oversight.  Is this enough to cut off any strike?  I would hope so.  The move signals a positive face for Russia, taking responsibility to arrange a way out of a very dangerous situation.  If Assad cooperates his actions would signal possible further more peaceful ways to bring the Civil War to an end.  The scenario I favor is using the UN intervention to separate the sides and then pushing them to the negotiating table.  There would probably not be a perfect Western style Democracy, but quite Franklin(y):  A bad peace is better than a good war.  If this works out a model of state behavior may evolve that will eventually settle the region. Until there is a serious no holds barred face to face back and forth with the only violence allowed is raising your voice we will move from crisis to crisis.  If our President had a hand in making Russia come forth with this proposal, I am a proud American today.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. sue-kennedy says

    September 9, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    among available bad options.
    Syria looks like it going to get worse. Worse if we take military action, worse if we don’t.
    This option would take care of the chemical weapons problem without the US being responsible for the difficulties which are inevitable in Syria’s future.
    Hopefully it is a possibility and the unrealistic optimist can also hope that it can be a first step to opening negotiations.

    Log in to Reply
  2. howlandlewnatick says

    September 9, 2013 at 5:31 pm

    In recent memory the West persuaded both the leaders of Iraq and Libya to divest themselves of weapons of mass destruction. They did so. We toppled their governments. Many thousands were maimed and killed. It can be argued that citizens of both countries are worse off now than under the old dictators.

    Western military doctrine calls for rapid movement. The threat of poison gas slows the attacker.

    Imagine being in a dark charcoal bag with heavy rubber gloves and boots. A hooded protective mask of black rubber encloses your face and head. No, no one’s yet figured out a safe way to exit bodily solids and fluids… Now, run around in 100 degree heat – there’s no air conditioning in your MOPP gear and sweat puddles under your chin. It slows you down. It denies the attacker mobility through targeted areas. Not what the West wants. The West wants to Blitzkrieg through enemy positions to quick victory. That’s why we want Syria to get rid of poison gasses. No one in power in Washington or Europe cares about the people of Syria. This is a tough, brutal world. Getting rid of Syria’s WMD only postpones the attack. We are a warrior nation catering to the desires of the death merchants and power hungry.

    “I have a scheme for stopping war. It’s this — no nation is allowed to enter a war till they have paid for the last one.” –Will Rogers

    Log in to Reply
    • Donald Green says

      September 9, 2013 at 6:01 pm

      Russia is an ally not an antagonist of Syria. The UN will be used to ensure the CW are destroyed. The next step would be peacekeeping with the UN assuring the proper parties negotiate and hammer out some acceptable solution. This trumps any punishing of Syrian leadership if life becomes more settled. At present 25% of the population in Syria is displaced. They should have some confidence they can return, relieving the accepting countries of an economic burden and allowing these people to return to more normal every day living. No option is clear as to outcome, but any that does not involve military action is preferable.

      Log in to Reply
      • jconway says

        September 9, 2013 at 7:00 pm

        Scott Pelley interrupted the US Open to announce that the President was in contact with Russian diplomats to see if this was a credible plan. I am hoping it can be worked out and accepted. Bringing inspectors in and letting them do their job to destroy these weapons would do a lot to lower the tensions, and would be a vindication of diplomacy and international law as a viable solution over the ‘might makes right/shoot first ask questions later’ military first response we have been pursuing.

        Log in to Reply
    • petr says

      September 11, 2013 at 12:41 pm

      In recent memory the West persuaded both the leaders of Iraq and Libya to divest themselves of weapons of mass destruction. They did so.We toppled their governments.

      A) In Iraq the question hinged on the whether the divestment was both committed and complete so we really can’t say we ‘persuaded’. And, 2) Although ‘we’ helped, ‘we’ did not ‘topple’ the government in Libya.

      Many thousands were maimed and killed. It can be argued that citizens of both countries are worse off now than under the old dictators.

      I do not think that this can be argued. Nor do I think that the swirl of variables, including the ‘Arab Spring’ and the general anti-dictator movement (if not, alas, pro-democracy), should be discounted so handily in the mix of things that have improved or degraded life and/or quality thereof.

      Log in to Reply
  3. ryepower12 says

    September 10, 2013 at 1:20 am

    had a little gaffe by making a clearly unplanned statement that if Syria gave up all its chemical weapons, that could avoid an attack.

    The administration tried to walk that back, but Russia quickly jumped on it, saying it was a good idea. At that point, the administration couldn’t really walk it back.

    Given that the House isn’t likely to support military strikes, the White House probably sees this as a much more realistic option now. Furthermore, it’s in Russia’s interest to secure these weapons, too, since it would avoid an attack on a country key to Russia and would prevent rebels from getting their hands on any of these weapons (and plenty of those rebels wouldn’t mind shipping those weapons to places in Russia).

    In Syria’s case, it makes sense for Assad for pretty obvious reasons: it’s better than military intervention that could quickly spiral into an attempt at regime change.

    So, yes, I think there’s a lot of reason to believe that this is credible, even if it probably wasn’t what the President had on his mind 24-48 hours ago. It certainly solves a lot of problems for all the governments involved, which more or less forces it to be seriously considered.

    Log in to Reply
    • Donald Green says

      September 10, 2013 at 6:29 am

      I have been watching re-runs of West Wing, a series using consultations from both sides of the aisle. Nothing is unscripted in major policy like this. A plan had to be devised to give all parties some cache, including Syria. My vote is for some expert diplomacy and making war mongers look bad, wherever they exist. Can’t we have a proud moment as American citizens? If this works out with even greater progress, all stripes of political thinking should give the President and his counterpart in Russia their due. Time to accept a bad peace rather than a good war.

      Log in to Reply
      • fenway49 says

        September 10, 2013 at 9:07 am

        Beyond the killing and suffering that comes with any war, I can’t see a good outcome in Syria right now. Either Assad stays or he’s replaced by conservative Islamists, which is bad news for the people of Syria who aren’t conservative Islamists. There is no sufficiently strong moderate force ready to assume control of the country.

        Log in to Reply
        • Donald Green says

          September 10, 2013 at 9:55 am

          Assad runs a secular government with allowing both genders and religions to participate in the society. He invokes tribal warfare to squelch any opposition and this is what require fixing through any opportunity that allows parties to reasonably negotiate. The UN will be on the ground to inspect and if things go well, maybe peacekeeping will be next. Who knows? Egypt and Israel came to a peace agreement. There does not have to be a government takeover in Syria just a more tolerant basis and improvement in their economy. With nothing else on the horizon, my inclination is to grab any circumstance that chooses even a bad peace over a good war.

          Log in to Reply
          • fenway49 says

            September 11, 2013 at 12:50 pm

            I agree with you on the course of action. Just saying the decision’s even easier when it’s not a “good war.” Our involvement, as publicly proposed by the administration, would amount to taking sides against Assad in the internal conflict. If that strengthens the hand of the opposition, I don’t see how how their ultimate victory would be good news.

            Log in to Reply
      • becool5555 says

        September 10, 2013 at 11:21 am

        and it seems more and more like the invasion may have been a bluff (and a very convincing one) on behalf of the administration to try to get Russia to take some action against Syria.

        Log in to Reply
      • ryepower12 says

        September 10, 2013 at 11:57 pm

        Clearly you haven’t been paying attention to Kerry’s years of public service ;P

        There is such a thing as a gaffe and almost every politician has them, but while Kerry is skilled in many areas of politics, he is more prone to gaffes than most other politicians. I think that’s a pretty factual statement.

        The fact that the administration tried to quickly walk this back, before Russia latched on, was a pretty open admission that it was a gaffe.

        It doesn’t really matter in the end if a gaffe turns into something good. Lots of mistakes lead into positives. Let’s take advantage of this one.

        Log in to Reply
        • Christopher says

          September 11, 2013 at 7:22 am

          …but Jon Stewart had a good bit last night comparing John Kerry to Mr. Magoo on this.

          Log in to Reply
        • petr says

          September 11, 2013 at 1:14 pm

          …It is an open admission that Kerry and Obama don’t necessarily see eye-to-eye on the need to attack. Kerry and Obama are both smart people, but I think advantage goes to Kerry on issues of foreign policy, negotiating and diplomacy. I don’t see him as above making such a statement in order to give Russia the opening it needed if he thought the outcome would be better.

          Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

raylaforma RaylaForMA @raylaforma ·
28m

Interesting little case going on in Virginia. Don't you think? @wbz @7News #historic #mapoli

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0QFrSq5KzjuQwRMrMeXwgzdvd7khKPuFsueDAMKsF1aapQKLzkUpiMsd4b23suXgwl&id=100057082794984

Reply on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Retweet on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Like on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Twitter 1559930291506085888
robyn4senate Robyn Kennedy @robyn4senate ·
29m

Thank you Viviana Abreu-Hernandez and Linda Maykel for hosting an incredible gathering yesterday. I am empowered by our conversations and look forward to putting in the work in the senate to ensure that the concerns of our communities are heard. #mapoli #worcpoli #senate

2

Reply on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Retweet on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Like on Twitter 1559929893877678086 1 Twitter 1559929893877678086
supaman90692910 Supaman @supaman90692910 ·
30m

no diehl #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Retweet on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Like on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Twitter 1559929729427406849
nwayne66 I slapped SCOTUS & Ouiser Boudreaux💉💉💉😷🇺🇦 @nwayne66 ·
33m

Leader of police advisory panel 'shocked' to be denied access to internal #Pittsfield police report on fatal shooting https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/advisory-panel-police-pittsfield/article_3c590570-1dbb-11ed-8995-93f5c15d3873.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share via @berkshireeagle #mapoli #westernmass #MiguelEstrella

Reply on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Retweet on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Like on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Twitter 1559928967271964678
martilliforrep Martilli for Congress @martilliforrep ·
37m

Thank you @newsmax for having me on alongside some great guests.

@ShaunKraisman @EmmaRechenberg @mgburkholder @ButlerForIL1

#MA01 #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927827310546945 Retweet on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Like on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Twitter 1559927827310546945
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
38m

GOP governor hopeful Chris Doughty and running mate Kate Campanale are holding a presser to bash the “deceit” from Democratic candidate for governor AG Maura Healey on tax relief. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Retweet on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Like on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Twitter 1559927756749692928
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.