Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Where do MA5 Congressional candidates stand on campaign finance, voting rights, and more?

September 26, 2013 By creightt

Common Cause Massachusetts asked the ten candidates in the race to fill Ed Markey’s vacated seat for Massachusetts’ fifth Congressional district seven questions covering issues of voting rights, campaign finance, and ethics.

  1. Would you support legislation like the Voter Empowerment Act (H.R. 12) to create national voting standards to ensure free, fair, and accessible elections nationwide?
  2. Do you support legislation to reinstate Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act with an updated coverage formula?
  3. Would you support a constitutional amendment affirming that 1) rights protected under the Constitution are the rights of natural persons and not of incorporated entities and 2) money spent to influence elections may be regulated by Congress and the states?
  4. Would you support legislation like the DISCLOSE Act (H.R. 148) to ensure that all political spending in federal elections by corporations and independent political groups is publicly disclosed? 
  5. Would you support legislation like the Fair Elections Now Act (H.R. 269) to enact a citizen funded election model that matches small dollar donations with federal funds?
  6. Do you support legislation to establish a bright-line test that permits non-profit groups like 501(c)4 to engage only in a de minimis, insubstantial amount of campaign activity?
  7. Do you support legislation like the Supreme Court Ethics Act of 2013 (H.R. 2902) to require Supreme Court justices to adopt the Code of Ethics?

Six of the candidates – Katherine Clark, Peter Koutoujian, Martin Long, Paul John Maisano, Carl Sciortino, and Karen Spilka – supported Common Cause’s positions on all of these issues.

One candidate – Will Brownsberger – supported Common Cause’s positions on instating national voting standards, fixing Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, ensuring greater campaign finance disclosure, and requiring the Supreme Court to adopt a Code of Ethics. However, contrary to Common Cause, he is not supportive of a constitutional amendment affirming constitutional rights for people, not corporations, and affirming Congress and the States’ power to regulate election spending. He also remained undecided on public financing of elections and regulating the political activity of non-profit groups. See his full responses here.

One candidate – Tom Tierney – supported Common Cause’s positions on greater campaign finance disclosure and regulating political activity of non-profit groups, but diverged from Common Cause’s positions on the other issues. See his full responses here.

And two candidates – Mike Stopa and Frank Addivinola – did not return completed questionnaires.

See a breakdown of all the candidates’ responses here.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: citizens-united, Common Cause Massachusetts, Democracy Amendment, DISCLOSE Act, fair elections, MA5 congressional, public-financing, Supreme Court Ethics, Voter Empowerment Act, voting-rights-act

Comments

  1. HeartlandDem says

    September 27, 2013 at 6:38 am

    I am struck again by the talent, intelligence and depth of the field of five.

  2. tarbelsanklebiter says

    September 27, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    According to the Arlington Advocate Will Brownsberger thinks it would be a good idea to delay implementation of the Affordable Care Act by 1 year to appease the Republicans. He supposedly said you can’t always get what you want. I just don’t see how this is a progressive position…to allow people to go without health care for a full year…I mean that is a life or death issue for many people! So I sure don’t think Ed Markey’s seat should go to this kind of deal-making ie making deals with people’s lives at stake!

    • drjat42 says

      September 27, 2013 at 11:52 pm

      Here’s the link.

      I’m not sure which is worse the policy, the politics, or the precedent.

      • Jasiu says

        September 28, 2013 at 8:51 am

        This was at the end of the forum where each of the candidates were asking the others a question. Will’s question was: Would you push the ACA back a year and agree to chained-CPI for SS. He was the only one to say yes.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.