Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Transparency on candidate questionnaires: What will it take?

January 23, 2014 By Andrei Radulescu-Banu

Scot Lehigh, of the Globe, asked the candidates for Governorship whether they will make public their written responses to the usual list of questions sent to them by endorsing organizations (i.e., our environmental, education, business organizations and unions).

In response, only Juliette Kayyem and Charlie Baker announced they will unconditionally make their questionnaire responses public.

Steve Grossman would release the questionnaires only if the special interest who elicited them would permit. Ditto for Don Berwick. And Martha Coakley, not to be outdone by the rest of the pack, will only do it if all other candidates do it.

Why, I am asking – why is this so hard?

Why are these candidates planning to submit everything to the special interests in writing, signature attested, while telling the electorate at large to look the other way?

I attended the debate in Lexington. Grossman and Berwick did sound impressive to me. But their reluctance to be transparent on the questionnaires is very disappointing.

Andrei Radulescu-Banu

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. danfromwaltham says

    January 23, 2014 at 1:33 pm

    If the special interests won’t permit their questions to be published, then the candidates should not fill them out…period, end of story. Shame on those who would cower and only release the questionnaire if given the okay by the special interest. That is not leadership, Steve Grossman, Martha Coakley, and Don Berwick, you failed the Will Brownsberger test of open transparency.

    I am glad to know Kayyem and Baker won’t be pushed around.

  2. Christopher says

    January 23, 2014 at 5:26 pm

    …that the organizations in question be the ones releasing the surveys. Candidates who respond should always assume their answers will get out eventually.

    • pogo says

      January 24, 2014 at 8:51 am

      I assume you’ve seen some of these questionnaires. They often cover very obscure issues that are VERY important to the group in question. And often the issue of concerned is addressed in the bowels of government and not widely covered by the media. So the general public has no idea what the candidate promised, or that the promise was fulfilled by administrative actions that the media covered.

      That does not pass my transparency test.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.