Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

John W. Henry should merge Telegram and Globe

February 7, 2014 By margiebh

As a native midwesterner I know that my state of birth is a fly-over state.  A friend once put it this way “Oh yeah, you’re from one of those semi-square states between here and California.”  Little did he know that at night back home they recline in lawn chairs by their personal lake shore and point binocs toward the stars and call out “There’s United 0223 on time headed to San Jose.”

I wonder if the folks in Worcester, Auburn and Springfield don’t do their own version of the mid-coastal fly-over.  Personally, I’d like to know more about what’s going on in mid-Massachusetts.

 

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. JimC says

    February 8, 2014 at 9:54 am

    I remember hearing something about a snag, but I’m not sure how it was resolved.

    • tracynovick says

      February 9, 2014 at 8:01 pm

      (it was outstanding litigation that had to be settled first)
      From the T&G’s own reports. he is looking for the right, preferably local, buyer.
      And with all due respect to your fine metro Boston selves, I’d rather we didn’t become another addendum to your Metro section.

  2. SomervilleTom says

    February 8, 2014 at 10:54 am

    I’d be content if the headline and lede were reliably true.

    Headlines that are simple lies — such as “Health law projected to put dent in workforce” in Wednesday’s Globe — belong in the Herald or the Daily News.

    I understand and accept that every person has a point of view, and the Globe is owned by an individual. I do NOT accept that such power includes the right to misinform the public about issues of objective fact.

    John W. Henry should insist that his publications tell the truth.

    • Christopher says

      February 8, 2014 at 12:53 pm

      …but my understanding is that the headline you cite is correct. “Put dent in” is more neutral than “throw people out of”. The former just says numbers will go down, which is projected to happen by people leaving their jobs they no longer need to be covered. The latter says that the law will force people into the unemployment line. Sure, “allow people to leave” might have been an even better verb phrase, but I would judge what was used to be the truth.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.