Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Baker’s Budget Looks to be a Shell Game

March 8, 2015 By johnk

MassBudget’s analysis is out and it’s not good. Those who suspected the film tax credit pre-budget release as a choreographed distraction had our biggest fears reinforced.

Charlie Baker’s budget is shaping up to be draconian, in pushing for an enormous hit in staffing, areas where we all know are not adequately staffed now and going to the hit with highly skilled senior staff leaving without replacement. Baker has targeting a reduction of 4500 staff with layoffs if the early retirement program does not get his intended results.

the budget counts on $178 million in savings from an early retirement program. To achieve this savings the state would have to leave unfilled most of the positions of people who take the early retirement option.

Here’s the money quote:

we have seen how understaffing has undermined the ability of the Department of Children and Families to protect children at risk of abuse or neglect. While many workers in that department may not be eligible for this early retirement, it is a reminder that real people can be harmed when important public functions are not adequately staffed.

MassBudget also highlighted the shell game that Charlie is playing with the budget numbers, they are shown in a way that appears that a great many areas will be level funding, but they won’t if his “plan” is successful

If the early retirement plan does produce savings, then there will be significant cuts across state government that are not being shown in the appropriations in the House 1 proposal. The savings from early retirement are presented as separate from line item appropriations. But if the savings are achieved, it will mean that actual spending in a number of parts of government will be much less than what is shown in the budget.

Still not enough information on the Baker administration plans on MassHealth re-determination process. Baker is desperate to squeeze out dollars, that in itself should at least give everyone pause. Because finding ways to take people off the rolls in not usually a governor’s priority. If you think how Republicans removed voters during elections, similar issues arose in the re-determinations, change of address, hard to understand paper work and language barriers have been used against those who should be covered by are taken off the rolls and in many cases people never knew until they had a medical emergency. Also, how is Baker planning on identifying, is he looking to use an outside agency like Maximus.?

A lot more questions there, but at this point it does appear that these little games is what we have to look forward to from the governor’s office.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. Mark L. Bail says

    March 8, 2015 at 4:47 pm

    for nicknames?

    Three-Card Charlie?

    I noticed that his budget shifts costs to municipalities by cutting charter school reimbursements and funds for special education circuit breaker funds. The latter helps defray extraordinary costs incurred from special education. These costs can arise from external placements, which can run from $60,000 a year to over $250,000. It has become de rigeur for school systems to try to deny services and placements that they need because they cost so much. The lack of charter school reimbursements just leads to municipalities paying more to subsidize charter schools.

  2. Peter Porcupine says

    March 8, 2015 at 6:47 pm

    …is the widespread practice of artificial impoverishment to get the state to pay your nursing home tab.

    Not that either party will investigate THAT on-going scam. Although Charlie WAS around when Weld tried….

    • Christopher says

      March 8, 2015 at 9:43 pm

      …and that MediCAID was for people in need. Sounds like something else just going to a single payer system would render moot.

      • Peter Porcupine says

        March 8, 2015 at 10:46 pm

        I am using my phone again, and its tiny keyboard. And you can’t edit a comment.

        I figured that since CARE is Federal abd therefore not part of Baker’s budget, it would be understood that I wad referring to AID instead of CARE (although I don’t understand why nursing home care isn’t on Medicare anyway, except that then it would have to be covered in all 50 states).

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.