Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Could the center save us from Trump?

August 1, 2016 By Sean 23 Comments

I’ll leave for another day or a wiser person how increased political polarization and the GOP response to it has given us the Trump candidacy. What is relevant now: political polarization makes a Trump victory more likely, but also gives the muddled middle a meaningful opportunity to torpedo Trump’s candidacy.

For our purposes, the polarization of our national politics has turned our government into a team sport. The polarization is arguably a positive trend, as the prior era of bi-partisanship was at least in part a function of forces of racial bigotry. And, polarization clarifies the parties’ policy objectives.

But, along with that clarification comes simpler power dynamics. If you, as an elected official, wish to see your policy objectives made enduring law, your team needs to sit atop most or all of the iron thrones: presidency, house majority, senate (super-)majority, and supreme court. If you are an elected Republican, the calculus for supporting the Republican nominee, no matter how vile his personal character, is easy. A nominal Republican will support tax cuts, reduce the safety net, support restrictions on abortion and other women’s health access, deny climate change, &c. A Democrat president, any Democrat, will veto your favorite legislation and nominate the wrong judges. If the outcome is bad enough, Democrats might actually get to pass legislation.

While Republican leaders are going to get vilified for their support of Trump, the rational decision — if they want to further their policy objectives — is to hold their noses, stick it out, and pray that somehow Clinton loses. Four years of Trump is just not as bad as enduring majority of Ruth Bader Ginsburgs. Bi-partisanship is a relic. And, abandoning Trump could very well have catastrophic impact down ticket.

There is no honor in politics. Ryan, McConnell, McCain and the rest are just not going to renounce his candidacy. His words and actions, maybe. But, not his candidacy.

Enter the moderates. If we think about the problem just in terms of the Supreme Court, an answer reveals itself. Some group of moderates from both parties could easily fashion some sort of agreement where the group Republicans would endorse Clinton and, in exchange, the group Democrats would promise to vote against particularly liberal nominees. The Susan Collinses of the world abandoning ship would be the end of Trump.

It wouldn’t have to be limited to the Supreme Court, though that might be enough. Such an agreement might be extended to lower courts and to specific legislative areas. The point is that moderate Republicans could put a stake through the heart of Trump’s campaign, without exposing the country to the perils of a progressive Clinton presidency. And, moderate Democrats would be their bi-partisan partners-in-crime.

Personally, I wouldn’t favor such saviors. I like Clinton’s odds. And, a bunch of Ruth Bader Ginsburgs would be a welcome tonic to the right’s efforts to empower corporations and the rich, deprive women of control over their bodies, deny climate change, &c. Following the philosophy of our greatest living politician (Pelosi, not Warren), when there is an opportunity to do good, we should seize it with two hands and make the most of it. The pendulum will swing back on its own. No need to help.

But, moderates have a rare opportunity, themselves, if they recognize it.

 

 

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. thegreenmiles says

    August 2, 2016 at 1:19 pm

    Hillary’s going to win. Why not just win? If Susan Collins thinks Trump isn’t presidential and doesn’t want to be tarred with him, that should be its own motivation to not endorse him (as Rep. Hanna did today).

    Log in to Reply
  2. Peter Porcupine says

    August 2, 2016 at 2:00 pm

    He won. Fair and Square. Against all odds and desires.

    WE did not cheat to bring about the result like the DNC did. We don’t LIKE the verdict of the voters, but we are bound by it.

    How do you repudiate a candidacy that the electorate has chosen? Bu saying WE know better than YOU do like the Democrats?

    And before you get into your lame protestations about how Bernie couldn’t have won anyway – then why did you need to cheat?

    Log in to Reply
    • methuenprogressive says

      August 2, 2016 at 2:36 pm

      the misogynistic and racist base of the GOP.
      You guys must be so proud.

      Log in to Reply
    • thegreenmiles says

      August 2, 2016 at 2:45 pm

      Stand up for what you think is right, even if it may be bad for your political career

      Log in to Reply
    • Christopher says

      August 2, 2016 at 3:05 pm

      …but none that I recall of actual cheating. There is absolutely nothing wrong with party leaders loudly proclaiming that they think their primary electorate chose the wrong person. If that is a “problem” it’s one the GOP has in spades this year. I’m not aware of any Democratic leader expressing reluctance or embarrassment by our choice.

      Log in to Reply
      • johntmay says

        August 3, 2016 at 6:08 pm

        And why did Amy Dacey resign with more party personnel moves expected on Tuesday, …if there was no actual cheating and nothing wrong with party leaders?

        Log in to Reply
        • methuenprogressive says

          August 3, 2016 at 6:18 pm

          Thanks for your concern.

          Log in to Reply
          • johntmay says

            August 3, 2016 at 6:21 pm

            You missed the definition. Oh well. Can you tell me why both women have quit/resigned and more are headed to the door when no one did anything wrong and it was above board, on the level, and not unfair to fellow Democrats?

            Log in to Reply
        • Christopher says

          August 3, 2016 at 11:18 pm

          …to show bias on the part of DNC staff in a contested primary, or at very least it’s bad optics. Doesn’t mean they cheated.

          Log in to Reply
    • JimC says

      August 2, 2016 at 3:41 pm

      Your Trump-induced cognitive dissonance is throwing off your curmudgeon game.

      WE (BMG) most certainly did not cheat. There is also no evidence that the DNC cheated — best evidence is that some people outright favored HRC, and some may have wanted to act badly. But there is no evidence of actual actions, as far as I’ve seen.

      And yes, it would not have mattered. But you know how paranoid people get, every threat must be taken seriously, or one might be accused of not worrying enough. So there’s your “need,” but it looks like nothing was done.

      Log in to Reply
    • SomervilleTom says

      August 2, 2016 at 4:40 pm

      I think that in the universe I live in, “fair and square” means — first and foremost — without lies. The entire Donald Trump phenomenon — from his very first scam to his current gig — is based on lies, distortions, and absolute amorality. The man appears to lack even a passing acquaintance with “the truth”.

      You might want to take another look at the votes actually cast:
      Democratic primary results (Choose “2016 Democratic” in “Primary by Year”):

      Clinton: 17,140,502
      Sanders: 13,222,780
      others: 477,954
      Total: 30,841,236

      Republican primary results (Choose “2016 Republican” in “Primary by Year”):

      Trump: 13,303,010
      Cruz: 7,392,884
      Rubio: 3,352,204
      Others: 5,588,283
      Total: 29,636,381

      I note that Bernie Sanders drew more primary votes than Mr. Trump, as did Ms. Clinton. Current polling says that about 90% of those who voted for Mr. Sanders in the primary prefer Ms. Clinton to Mr. Trump.

      Mr. Sanders and Ms. Clinton together drew 30,363,282 primary votes — compared to 13,303,010 for Mr. Trump.

      I don’t know what you see when you examine the GOP candidates and those who voted for them. What I see is a collection of clowns, buffoons, and religious extremists who all lost to a world-class clown, buffoon, and shyster. The legitimate GOP candidates failed to achieve more than a handful of votes (Mr. Kasich leading the way and unable to break out of the single digits).

      I agree with you that Donald Trump won a majority of GOP primary votes. That alone speaks eloquently to what the GOP has become.

      Log in to Reply
    • Mark L. Bail says

      August 3, 2016 at 7:03 pm

      ditched Trump in a New York minute if they could have:

      Log in to Reply
  3. methuenprogressive says

    August 2, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    in the privacy of the voting booth. But will tell their male relatives they voted for him.

    Log in to Reply
    • jconway says

      August 2, 2016 at 4:33 pm

      As has been their right since 1921. The one Republican woman who regularly contributes to this forum has been adamant that she won’t be voting for either Clinton or Trump. And most Republican women I know aren’t shy about telling the men in their life their political opinions.

      Log in to Reply
      • stomv says

        August 3, 2016 at 1:41 pm

        (shrugs)

        Log in to Reply
        • jconway says

          August 3, 2016 at 1:46 pm

          That’s precisely why the original comment was offensive and ill informed.

          Log in to Reply
          • Christopher says

            August 3, 2016 at 3:17 pm

            …then any number of other predictions people, including many of us, make from time to time about how a certain demographic will vote?

            Log in to Reply
          • methuenprogressive says

            August 3, 2016 at 6:31 pm

            of their womenfolk failing to be submissive.
            They’re going to vote like heroes.

            Log in to Reply
  4. jconway says

    August 3, 2016 at 8:39 am

    This strategy will successfully elect Clinton to the Presidency, but it will also lead to continued divided government. Most downballot Republicans are proving immune to being dragged down by Trump. On the House side, this is due to the brilliant RSLC statehouse strategy from seven years ago that gave them House control for a full decade insulated from the winds of popular votes. On the Senate side, it’s the result of McConnell’s pitch that Americans will prefer Clinton to Trump but will want a Republican Congress to keep her honest.

    A coalition committed to a populist progressive economic program that was more dexterous on cultural issues is a more sustainable governing coalition than our present one which is solidly socially progressive but economically dexterous. The greatest potential of the Sanders candidacy is the assembling of such a coalition, and it’s a potential Hillary will have a hard time fulfilling for reasons beyond her control (divided government, her polarization) and within her control (her cautious incrementalism leading to bad compromise).

    We will see, this is an existential election where many, many Republicans and right leaning independents will defect to the Democratic nominee but it won’t have the downballot impact people are predicting nor will it be a long term realignment.

    Log in to Reply
    • Christopher says

      August 3, 2016 at 8:52 am

      ..where I could actually sympathize with ticket-splitting. Most of the time it baffles me that one would vote for someone for President, presumably because you prefer that person’s agenda, but also vote for someone committed to undermining that agenda at every turn. I don’t want to concede it either, however. Dem candidates should blanket the airwaves with ads showing their opponent morphing into Trump.

      Log in to Reply
      • jconway says

        August 3, 2016 at 9:19 am

        I actually have a lot of respect for Mark Kirk, though I’ve liked Tammy Duckworth since her 2006 race. Interesting to see how that one plays out.

        Log in to Reply
        • Mark L. Bail says

          August 3, 2016 at 7:06 pm

          majority or not?

          More obstruction or less. How’s that tough?

          Log in to Reply
          • jconway says

            August 3, 2016 at 7:23 pm

            He went out on a limb for marriage equality, background checks, immigration reform and he is only Republican senator to support Merrick Garland. He has explicitly said he won’t vote for Trump. It’s similar to Whitehouse v. Chaffee in 2006.

            It’s the rare race this cycle where both candidates are respectable in my view, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t vote for Duckworth anymore than it means I wouldn’t have voted for Whitehouse. But I’m a Cambridge born liberal. To the Glencoe moderate, it may be tempting to split the ticket. That’s all I meant.

            Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 9 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe Boston Globe for 17-Aug-2022 reports (https://www.bo…
  • jconway on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThere have been four or five attempts to unseat Wong tha…
  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

teapartyusa1 Chris Lynch @teapartyusa1 ·
40m

In Dorchester, white conserve-a-dem political operatives are dragging white progressives.

In D.C. conserve-a-dem Joe Manchin came to terms with 49 @SenateDems to finally get these urgent needs addressed #MaPoli #BosPoli

603 Forward @603Forward

Because our delegation voted for the #InflationReductionAct - we’re finally pushing back against the climate crisis, we’re lowering health care + energy costs for families, we’re fighting inflation, + we’re getting giant greedy corporations to stop freeloading. #NHPolitics

Reply on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Retweet on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Like on Twitter 1559944214254960641 1 Twitter 1559944214254960641
edforboston Ed Flynn 愛德華費連 @edforboston ·
42m

Partnered w/city and state leaders on a letter to @MBTA. It is critical for our seniors, persons with disabilities, immigrant neighbors, BPS/community college students & working families in Chinatown to have a shuttle bus stop during the Orange Line shutdown. #bospoli #mapoli

Boston.com @BostonDotCom

Boston leaders call on the MBTA to add shuttle bus stop in Chinatown during Orange Line shutdown
https://trib.al/kz1qxqo

Reply on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Retweet on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Like on Twitter 1559943704412037121 1 Twitter 1559943704412037121
wtfdic_hour Brian Riccio @wtfdic_hour ·
44m

Once again, @JimAloisi depending on the kids that have no idea who or what he really is to make him seem like he's not or never has been an influence peddling lowlife. #mapoli? #mapoli!

Gintautas Dumcius @gintautasd

I also spoke with @JimAloisi, who pushed for a similar proposal in 2009 as the state's transportation chief.

“The test of a really good idea is whether it can survive the public debate and scrutiny for 13 years," said Aloisi. "And it has.”

Reply on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Retweet on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Like on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Twitter 1559943272411308033
hubobserver The Hub Observer 💎 @hubobserver ·
44m

"Democrats are firing on all cylinders." LOL #mapoli

Deval Patrick @DevalPatrick

The #InflationReductionAct cuts costs, creates good-paying jobs, and fights the climate crisis. And it's paid for responsibly, with taxes on the big corporations that hide their profits overseas.

Democrats are firing on all cylinders. Now, let's get out and vote this November.

Reply on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Retweet on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Like on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Twitter 1559943180371595264
activate_media Activate Media @activate_media ·
45m

VETERANS FOR PEACE SHOW Sunday, August 14th, 2022 - Activate Media https://buff.ly/3bP3B36
#boston #cambridge #worcester #lowell #nyc #manchester #providence #portland #bospoli #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Retweet on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Like on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Twitter 1559943007759175682
waltham_s Waltham Night's Watch @waltham_s ·
46m

Aww, Sam Racioppi is running for MA legislature, he has six tweets, none are about #mapoli or his district, and one is about us! We're flattered Sam!

Reply on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Retweet on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Like on Twitter 1559942824690388992 8 Twitter 1559942824690388992
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.