Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Congresswoman Trahan has some explaining to do.

April 15, 2019 By pogo 19 Comments

I don’t live in the 3rd Congressional district. I was not involved in anyway during the recent election in which now Congresswoman Trahan’s won a multi-candidate primary by only a handful of votes and just 22% of the primary voters.

Given the Boston Globe’s full throated endorsement and judging by some of her TV appearances, I was pretty much settled into respecting her tenure and looked forward to the possibility of supporting her for higher office. But not before she does some serious explaining about her basic integrity. Of course many at BlueMass are aware of some potential funny business and her inability to explain how hundreds of thousands of dollars suddenly appeared for her to use as personal funds during the critical closing days of the Democratic nomination for her Congressional seat. (BTW, this is a bipartisan problem.)

And as we wait for that explanation, The Intercept outlines in an article the carefully parsing of words the Congresswoman’s spokesperson used to distinguish between “Corporate PAC money” which Trahan promised not to accept and PACs connected to trade associations that represent that corporations that she refuses to take money from. So in the closing days of the campaign, this parsing of the english language allowed Trahan to accept money from the trade association “The Food Marketing Institute” that serves the interests of Walmart and other mega-grocery stores (Stop and Shop perhaps?) and at the same time, allowed her to tell Democratic activists that refuse contributions from Walmart’s corporate PAC. To me that is just part of the typical con game politicians of all stripes play with voters. Particularly base voters, who WANT to believe in their candidates and don’t look harder at the answers they want to hear.

This kind of behavior is particularly galling when the Congresswoman Trahan positions herself as a champion for “fixing” our political system,when she wrote:

“As part of the largest Democratic freshman class elected to the House since Watergate, this Congress — and particularly my freshmen colleagues — have a mandate to fix problems in our political system, to unrig our democracy, to unmoor the entrenched special interests in Washington, and to usher in a new standard of ethics and integrity that ensures that public servants serve the public, not line their own pockets.”

With her silence about the sudden surge of personal money into her campaign during the closing days, coupled with her parsing of words to hide her intent to take money from the “entrenched special interests” that run Washington DC, Congresswoman Trahan has some explaining to do.  But I doubt she will.  In the three months or so she has taken office, she was racked up an impressive record of hypocrisy.  There is nothing “new” and “refreshing” about the Congresswoman, just more of the same blah, blah, blah that is undermining the foundations of trust in our political system.

I hope progressives and Democrats don’t give her a pass.  She needs to be pressured into explaining her behavior.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+2
0

Filed Under: Editor, User

Comments

  1. betsey says

    April 15, 2019 at 5:12 pm

    Thanks for beating me to it, pogo! Now let’s see how long it takes for us to be accused of being purists over this…three…two…one….

    Log in to Reply
  2. Christopher says

    April 15, 2019 at 9:56 pm

    She seems to have a voting record solidly within the mainstream of the Democratic Party. I am not aware of any significant votes in which she has bucked the party line. I’m less concerned about campaign finance as long as it’s legal.

    Log in to Reply
    • pogo says

      April 16, 2019 at 9:30 am

      Your comment reminds me of the responses I get from many Trump defenders. While they may be uncomfortable about some of the things he says, they generally support his agenda and as long as everything he does is “legal” it’s OK.

      When did our political norms get so low that the standard is “as long as it’s legal”? There was a time when our political norms would never allow Congresswoman Trahan to parse words like this and let her get away with it. (Never mind what Trump gets away with.)

      As long as we have blind loyalty to “our team” (as you comment, “She seems to have a voting record solidly within the mainstream of the Democratic Party” exemplifies) and not loyalty to a higher moral sense of right and wrong, we are screwed as a society.

      This attitude is closer to Machiavelli’s “the ends justify the means” than the ideals and values on which our country was founded. Sad.

      Log in to Reply
      • Christopher says

        April 16, 2019 at 8:40 pm

        I frankly don’t have much of a higher moral sense regarding the minutia of campaign finance. Please tell me you did not just compare Lori Trahan to the Dangerous Unqualified Misogynistic Bigot who currently resides at 1600 Penn! Yes, I do generally learn to like our nominees even when they were not my primary choice (Trahan wasn’t), unless they really are DINOs or horrible human beings.

        Log in to Reply
        • pogo says

          April 16, 2019 at 10:31 pm

          I did not compare her to Trump, rather you with Machiavelli.

          Log in to Reply
          • Christopher says

            April 16, 2019 at 11:26 pm

            That’s pretty insulting too. I’ve actually read Prince and it’s not pretty. Trump is Machiavellian; I most certainly am not.

            Log in to Reply
            • pogo says

              April 18, 2019 at 2:17 pm

              What I heard from you is the “ends” of having “a voting record solidly within the mainstream of the Democratic Party” to justify the “means” of Trahan parsing words to hide the fact that she is indeed taking money from the very corporations that she promised to to take money from.

              If I’ve mischaracterized this, please clarify.

              Log in to Reply
              • Christopher says

                April 18, 2019 at 11:50 pm

                Well, I usually associate Machiavelli with harsher means than the mere parsing of words. The reason people are usually concerned about the sources of campaign funds is that the legislator might be tempted to do the bidding of said sources with her votes. What I’m saying is that if her voting record is good anyway then her sources of funding are a moot point. I also believe that we should take people very literally and exactly, which I guess is why I’ve so often been asked if I am or wish to be a lawyer.

                Log in to Reply
    • SomervilleTom says

      April 16, 2019 at 10:10 am

      I’ve been thinking about writing a whole diary about this “so long as it’s legal” canard.

      I think there’s a fundamental philosophical error at the heart of this assertion, having to do with what we see as the proper role and scope of government.

      If we accept a standard that says “… as long as it’s legal”, that standard implies that each and every act that we find morally or ethically objectionable must be made illegal. In my view, that demands a government that is FAR more intrusive than I find proper or desirable.

      We have already learned that the flagrant nepotism and job-selling of the Probation Department scandal was legal (the corruption counts were dismissed).

      It was still offensive and corrupt. “Legal” corruption is still corruption and I want no part of it.

      Log in to Reply
      • pogo says

        April 16, 2019 at 11:34 am

        Couldn’t agree more. We really don’t need any more laws. We need to restore the social norms we use to operate on. Like when the “appearance of a possible conflict of interest” disqualifies someone for a job involving public trust. But instead we operate to the very bottom of social norms, where “”it not illegal” is the standard. But is trying to restore the old social norm about as likely as coal jobs coming back?

        Log in to Reply
        • Christopher says

          April 16, 2019 at 9:16 pm

          Ugh! I absolutely HATE “appearances” of a conflict of interest. I’ve said for as long as I can remember don’t argue to me that it “looks” bad; prove to me that it IS bad. In this particular case, I want to see a voting record on Trahan’s part that shows she is doing the bidding of these trade associations, especially if it deviates from the way Dems vote generally before we complain too loudly. I’d love a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United and if I had my way only individuals could contribute to campaigns or we go entirely to public financing, but until we do I don’t want to unilaterally disarm either.

          Log in to Reply
          • bob-gardner says

            April 16, 2019 at 10:11 pm

            Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.

            Log in to Reply
            • Christopher says

              April 16, 2019 at 11:27 pm

              Well argued /s

              Log in to Reply
          • SomervilleTom says

            April 16, 2019 at 11:39 pm

            I think the reference to the appearance of a conflict of interest about the Probation Department scandal. That scandal WAS bad. I think I am not the only Massachusetts voter who views the dismissal of those convictions as a triumph of legal corruption over obvious common sense.

            It was obvious to every observer that the conspirators in the scandal were flagrantly corrupt. The court ruling that reversed the decisions only demonstrates how deeply the corruption permeates our legal system.

            In the case of Ms. Trahan, I think the apparent campaign finance violations are worth watching.

            Log in to Reply
            • Christopher says

              April 17, 2019 at 8:14 pm

              And I likewise recall not being nearly as upset as you were over the Probation matter.

              Log in to Reply
              • SomervilleTom says

                April 17, 2019 at 11:34 pm

                Indeed, my recollection is the same. You and I have VERY different standards for what we demand of our elected officials and for what we call “corrupt”.

                So far as I’m concerned, any official who offers jobs to clearly incompetent candidates in explicit exchange for political favors (such as budget approvals) is corrupt. I get that to you this is just patronage.

                So far as I’m concerned, “patronage” is a synonym for “bribery”.

                Log in to Reply
                • scott12mass says

                  April 18, 2019 at 7:52 am

                  Republicans tend to stay in the deeper (national) end of the pool and the Democrats stay in the shallower (local) end- but it’s the same cesspool.

                • SomervilleTom says

                  April 18, 2019 at 9:17 am

                  Perhaps. I think some of that is just statistics, though.

                  As much as I would like to believe that Republicans are more likely to be corrupt than Democrats, I suspect that what we’re seeing is just the dominance of Republicans nationally and Democrats locally.

                  Put another way, I suspect that there’s just as much local corruption in a Red state, and that local corruption is probably among local Republican office holders.

              • ptadoherty says

                April 20, 2019 at 9:08 pm

                That is as telling as it is disappointing.

                Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 8 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • jconway on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThere have been four or five attempts to unseat Wong tha…
  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

teapartyusa1 Chris Lynch @teapartyusa1 ·
10m

In Dorchester, white conserve-a-dem political operatives are dragging white progressives.

In D.C. conserve-a-dem Joe Manchin came to terms with 49 @SenateDems to finally get these urgent needs addressed #MaPoli #BosPoli

603 Forward @603Forward

Because our delegation voted for the #InflationReductionAct - we’re finally pushing back against the climate crisis, we’re lowering health care + energy costs for families, we’re fighting inflation, + we’re getting giant greedy corporations to stop freeloading. #NHPolitics

Reply on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Retweet on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Like on Twitter 1559944214254960641 1 Twitter 1559944214254960641
edforboston Ed Flynn 愛德華費連 @edforboston ·
12m

Partnered w/city and state leaders on a letter to @MBTA. It is critical for our seniors, persons with disabilities, immigrant neighbors, BPS/community college students & working families in Chinatown to have a shuttle bus stop during the Orange Line shutdown. #bospoli #mapoli

Boston.com @BostonDotCom

Boston leaders call on the MBTA to add shuttle bus stop in Chinatown during Orange Line shutdown
https://trib.al/kz1qxqo

Reply on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Retweet on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Like on Twitter 1559943704412037121 1 Twitter 1559943704412037121
wtfdic_hour Brian Riccio @wtfdic_hour ·
14m

Once again, @JimAloisi depending on the kids that have no idea who or what he really is to make him seem like he's not or never has been an influence peddling lowlife. #mapoli? #mapoli!

Gintautas Dumcius @gintautasd

I also spoke with @JimAloisi, who pushed for a similar proposal in 2009 as the state's transportation chief.

“The test of a really good idea is whether it can survive the public debate and scrutiny for 13 years," said Aloisi. "And it has.”

Reply on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Retweet on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Like on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Twitter 1559943272411308033
hubobserver The Hub Observer 💎 @hubobserver ·
14m

"Democrats are firing on all cylinders." LOL #mapoli

Deval Patrick @DevalPatrick

The #InflationReductionAct cuts costs, creates good-paying jobs, and fights the climate crisis. And it's paid for responsibly, with taxes on the big corporations that hide their profits overseas.

Democrats are firing on all cylinders. Now, let's get out and vote this November.

Reply on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Retweet on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Like on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Twitter 1559943180371595264
activate_media Activate Media @activate_media ·
15m

VETERANS FOR PEACE SHOW Sunday, August 14th, 2022 - Activate Media https://buff.ly/3bP3B36
#boston #cambridge #worcester #lowell #nyc #manchester #providence #portland #bospoli #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Retweet on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Like on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Twitter 1559943007759175682
waltham_s Waltham Night's Watch @waltham_s ·
16m

Aww, Sam Racioppi is running for MA legislature, he has six tweets, none are about #mapoli or his district, and one is about us! We're flattered Sam!

Reply on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Retweet on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Like on Twitter 1559942824690388992 8 Twitter 1559942824690388992
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.