Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Alternative Facts Are the True Enemy

October 8, 2019 By terrymcginty

Democrats need to:

1. Not engage in self-flagellation about attaining moral perfection while ignoring Trump, Trumpist accommodationists, and accompanying sycophants dismantling the entire legal system that has until recently regulated corruption and conflicts of interest;
2. Not repeat false flag information, misinformation, disinformation, and wildly out of proportion and irrelevant propaganda put out by Putin, his Russian bots, and his stooges in the White House; and
3. Focus on the emergency at hand: a wannabe dictator with zero respect for the rule of law, democracy, and our troops, who is staging the gradual destruction of our constitutional system of governance.

That’s what Democrats need to do.

Who should be the nominee is a completely legitimate point of natural disagreement and competition in the primary.

I personally will support whatever Democratic candidate gets the nomination, unless it’s Tulsi Gabbard, who has a very strange tendency to accommodate Trump’s bizarre affinity for Putin.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+3
0

Filed Under: Editor, User

Comments

  1. fredrichlariccia says

    October 8, 2019 at 3:35 pm

    It’s about time we, including on this blog, stop giving equal weight to truth and false-flag propaganda.,

    • fredrichlariccia says

      October 8, 2019 at 3:47 pm

      Trump repeatedly attacks Biden as “corrupt” because that’s what all wannabe fascist dictators do — just keep repeating the same lie over and over again to distract an apathetic, tranquilized population from your own corruption.

      • SomervilleTom says

        October 8, 2019 at 7:57 pm

        I watched MSNBC last night as well — I understand Rachel Maddow’s point. I sort-of agree — it is certainly true that the GOP has completely killed the phrase “fake news”, and we are all the more vulnerable to a repeat in 2020 because of that.

        At the same time, the plain fact is that if Hunter Biden had not taken that no-show job with Burisma at a sweet $50K/month — or the similar deal with China — this whole episode would be different.

        I’m not defending anybody in Donald Trump’s orbit. I’m saying that whatever Donald Trump and Trumpists do, Vice President Joe Biden should have recused himself from anything involving the Ukraine once Hunter Biden did his deal. What Mr., Biden did instead was perpetuate an obvious conflict of interest.

        Speaking of Rachel Maddow’s show last night, one of her featured guests was Michael Carpenter. In his segment, he gave a spirited argument about why all of the criticism of Joe Biden was nonsense.

        Ms. Maddow did say, several times, that he was a affiliated with the Penn Biden center. What she could have and should have been MUCH more clear about is that he is a DIRECTOR of the Penn Biden center, and the Penn Biden center was created by Joe Biden.

        That is a significant omission. It frankly makes the entire situation seem even more corrupt. It leaves me with the impression that not only did Joe Biden fail to do the right thing while VP, but also that Rachel Maddow is little different from any of the talking heads on Fox News.

        If Rachel Maddow is going to devote a piece to showing that there is absolutely no substance at all to the criticisms of Joe Biden then she should find a guest whose livelihood literally depends on him defending Joe Biden. It really isn’t any different from Sean Hannity bringing on Kellyanne Conway to assure us that there’s no substance to any of the allegations against Donald Trump. It’s plain old propaganda, not news.

        I have higher standards for Democrats, and I have higher standards for journalists. If that makes me a “purist”, so be it.,

        • jconway says

          October 9, 2019 at 9:13 am

          Another related point is that while what Hunter Biden and Mitch McConnell have done with their foreign business partners is perfectly legal, it really shouldn’t be. This doesn’t change the fact that was Trump did is presently illegal and unconstitutional and grounds for his removal from office. It is, but he thrives when he can insulate his flaws by pointing out the flaws of others. I think we can best avoid that by picking a candidate without Biden’s flaws, and we have many alternatives to choose from this cycle.

  2. doubleman says

    October 8, 2019 at 4:08 pm

    You guys really beat this purity horse.

    I think all of us have enough capacity to know that Trump is awful and corrupt and dangerous and all the rest while also thinking that Biden is mediocre and the stuff with his son stinks to high hell.

    3. Focus on the emergency at hand: a wannabe dictator with zero respect for the rule of law, democracy, and our troops, who is staging the gradual destruction of our constitutional system of governance.

    Here’s the problem. Some of us think we can just remove this guy and the problem is solved. But it doesn’t solve the real problems. Unless we dismantle the structures and circles that enable people like Trump, we’re going to have another Trump, except one who is probably a lot smarter and more effective. I’m not sure if any candidate for President can accomplish these changes, but at least two are moving in that direction and trying to build and nurture alternative sources of power to really solve our true problems. Biden, on the other hand, thinks we can just stop this one thing and it will all go back to normal. Dude actually thinks McConnell is going to a reasonable and helpful guy once Trump is out!

    It’s depressing seeing the brouhaha with Ellen Degeneres this week about how she is friends with George W. The same guy that ruined the economy, let a city drown, and lied to get us into a war that killed a million people. But now he’s a good guy! Remember what we used to say about Bush? It’s pretty close to what you’ve written above about Trump.

    We’re going to be doing the same thing with Trump as we’ve done with Bush in a few years when the next worst one comes along unless we make some real changes. And if getting those changes takes some “purity,” we should be all for it.

    • jconway says

      October 8, 2019 at 6:31 pm

      How is this materially different from the Hillary campaign which failed to win the Electoral College?

      This does nothing about the real palpable sense of cultural and personal failure that accompanied deindustrialization and job less. For those that dismiss that as a white issue, I’d be remiss to remind you that black males lost those jobs first and in far larger numbers. We have several failed cities and failed states throughout the country, and gentrification alone is not enough to fix them.

      We have a housing, education, and healthcare affordability crisis matched to flat lined wages. I think our nominee needs to have real plans that fix those problems, not run on a status quo that isn’t working and helped elect Trump.

      I have a lot of real issues with Jeremy Corbyn, but I do give Labour credit for going beyond Brexit to diagnose the actual root cause of the mass discontent and xenophobia that led to it in the first place. Mainly the bipartisan austerity and privatization agenda of the two parties prior to Brexit. Now they are a party for the many, not the few. The Democrats should be the same thing.

      Similarly, if Democrats are running on the same free trade and open borders playbook that Paul Ryan and Hillary Clinton failed to win with-its time to run on something else. The DC consensus on deficits, trade. entitlements, and borders was wrong. This is the swamp people elected Trump to drain.

      We can run on human rights for immigrants and a compassionate approach to immigration reform if we pair it with higher wages, better jobs, and better health care for the native born. Otherwise, we look like the same old politicians who bailed out Wall Street while Main Street was underwater.

      • doubleman says

        October 8, 2019 at 7:57 pm

        Absolutely, and only two candidates are running with plans to deal with those issues (plus a third who has identified them but also thrown his hands up and just wants to pay people to reduce their coming pain). I think one (Sanders) is better at attacking the problems and building a diverse base of long-term power, and the other (Warren) would be a better manager over the next few years.

        Both, individually, represent a course change, and together could be a transformational force.

        But yeah, I’ll keep going after Biden until it’s truly a race only between him and a Republican. Until then, I think he, and the politics he represents, needs to be soundly defeated.

      • Christopher says

        October 8, 2019 at 10:43 pm

        PLEASE do not concede the swamp imagery – DC before Trump was a freshwater spring compared to what Trump turned it into!

        • jconway says

          October 9, 2019 at 5:57 am

          Tell that to the voters in Rockland who still say Trump is doing good on the economy and shaking things up.

          Now that article is somewhat critical of my candidate as the out of touch Harvard elitist who cannot win over places like Rockland, let alone, Macomb County Michigan. It’s why she’s taken great pains of late to emphasize her stage school education and early job as a teacher. These cultural markers matter.

          People want somebody tough and outside the system. It’s hard for me to see Biden being able to play that up. Most ordinary people don’t have Vice Presidents as fathers to make (perfectly legal) business connections off of.

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 7:59 am

            Those Rockland supporters of Donald Trump are not going to vote for ANY Democratic candidate no matter who the candidate is or what they say.

            I can guess what the “man at Uptown’s Finest Barbershop” had to say about Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, or Bill Clinton.

            I don’t think that 49-year old white male high school graduate who is either ignorant, dishonest, or both is going to vote for ANY Democratic nominee. He asserts that Ms. Warren will tax him, in the face of all the facts. He drives a car with an NRA sticker on its windshield. Is he going to vote for Joe Biden? Bernie Sanders? I don’t think so. It’s best to wish that voter goodbye and good luck and move on to the next.

            The article you cite offers this explanation for the anti-Warren sentiment of Rockland:

            As he explained, places like Rockland, on the South Shore of Massachusetts, need to be understood as products of “white flight” from Boston, following court-ordered school busing in the mid-1970s.

            The conclusion of that piece is also worth quoting here (emphasis mine):

            As I was reminded in Rockland, the task of beating Mr. Trump doesn’t require passion for the president’s challenger, whoever that may be. The president, too, arouses a visceral dislike among some people there. One man, a Vietnam veteran who works at the American Legion post in Rockland, screwed up his face at my mention of the president. Among the things he finds unappealing is Mr. Trump’s disdainful posture toward the news media. We chatted about the fractious state of American politics at the Rockland Bar and Grill, as he sipped his Guinness. “If it’s down to Trump and Warren, it’s definitely Warren,” he declared without hesitation. Ms. Warren versus Mr. Trump would be a grind, but that, it might be said, is the story of her life.

            I note that Rockland supported Barack Obama, 4,526 to 3,989, in 2012. Rockland also supported Hillary Clinton 4,403 to 4,313 in 2016.

            I assert, once again, that trying to change the votes of the segment you’re talking about is a fool’s errand.

            It is far easier, and therefore better, to overwhelm those votes with newly registered voters and with turnout from supporters.

            • jconway says

              October 9, 2019 at 8:44 am

              I think we can do both/and. I definitely agree these folks are not more likely to vote for Biden, chasing that fallacy is a fools errand. I think if we focus on economics and get more of those union blue collar types who love Liz to show up in her campaign and her ads, we have a real shot. I think she’s great in Town Halls. It’s about cutting through that noise and emphasizing her heartland roots and Harry Truman style populist spirit of taking on the big corporations. People will want that.

              It’s about cutting the gap in wwc support for the GOP from 2016 35% to 2020 15%. I think Hillary, like Biden, is emphasizing stability and status quo restoration. I think it’s a losing strategy. We need big structural change packaged in a way that low educated, non-culturally progressive voters can understand.

          • Christopher says

            October 9, 2019 at 9:41 am

            He’s shaking things up all right, but in a horrible way. He got lucky on the economy, but that nowhere near makes up for the bullying, lawbreaking, ally-shunning, definitely not making America great again actions.

            • jconway says

              October 10, 2019 at 12:50 pm

              I don’t disagree with that diagnosis but it smacks of the tone deaf ‘America is already Great’ approach. That we swap out blatant lawlessness and sheer incompetence for a system that bailed out bankers and left ordinary people hanging out to dry. Warren and Sanders have diagnosed the real villains-it’s not Trump-it’s the rigged system where somebody like Trump gets to inherit money, invest it poorly, get bailed out, and rinse and repeat.

              Trump isn’t alone, he is right when he said everyone at that level plays by those rules. Those rules are wrong. That system needs to be destroyed. We need to get all the money changers out of the temple of our democracy. We need to hire American, make American, and take care of each other again. We need to integrate America. Not with the warped white nationalism of the far right or the anti-pluralism of the woke left, but with genuine solidarity for one another.

              I like Warren cause shes the first Roosevelt Democrat to come around in a long time. Someone who recognizes the virtues as well as the vices of capitalism, and seeks to enable the former and restrain the latter.

    • Christopher says

      October 8, 2019 at 10:41 pm

      Bush is a much better person than Trump – no room for discussion there.

      • doubleman says

        October 8, 2019 at 10:58 pm

        1 million dead Iraqis might disagree.

        I don’t care if Bush is a nicer man than Trump. The destruction he and his administration brought in this country and around the world should never be forgiven. The mindset that if someone is better than Trump, they are somehow good or on “our side” is insane. It’s been one of the most infuriating and disappointing things about the past few years. Some of the worst people to ever have power in our country are now our buddies because they don’t like Trump. Everyone, even %&*$ing Dick Cheney have been rehabilitated. Even people in the Trump WH have been rehabilitated. Spicer is on a major TV show. That piece of sh*t should be afraid to go out in public.

        We had Nixon, and Reagan, and W, and now Trump, unless we really make changes (upending elite power dynamics and holding people accountable for their actions), the next one is going to be even worse.

        But sure, let’s keep thinking he’s a complete aberration.

      • SomervilleTom says

        October 8, 2019 at 11:24 pm

        That’s like saying that John Dillinger was a much better person than Al Capone.

        George W. Bush is an unprosecuted war criminal who ordered policies of kidnapping, rape, beating, torture, and murder from the Oval Office.

        Bush and Trump are two clowns in the same GOP circus.

        • jconway says

          October 9, 2019 at 6:14 am

          Would we have a climate denying, jingoistic, religious right kowtowing, feelings over facts political culture without Bush? I doubt it. All the seeds for Trumpism were planted by that presidency.

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 7:14 am

            We Democrats took a majority in the House in the 2006 election. The evidence of crimes against humanity committed by George W. Bush and Richard Cheney was compelling. Huge, largely secret, no-bid contracts were issued to Halliburton — the family business of Mr. Cheney prior to his stint as Vice President. Similar sweetheart deals were given to Blackwater, another mercenary trafficker in violence.

            Our new majority, led by newly-elected Speaker Nancy Pelosi, did absolutely nothing about any of this. The Washington Post reported in 2007 that Nancy Pelosi, along with other members of the House, was briefed by the CIA and even given a tour of its waterboarding facility in 2002 (emphasis mine):

            Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

            “The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough,” said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.
            …
            Yet long before “waterboarding” entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

            With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

            Individual lawmakers’ recollections of the early briefings varied dramatically, but officials present during the meetings described the reaction as mostly quiet acquiescence, if not outright support. “Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing,” said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. “And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement.”

            Nancy Pelosi had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the current fight, and it remains to be seen whether she actually wants to pursue it. Her history in these matters does not give me confidence.

            It is certainly true that the “seeds for Trumpism were planted by that presidency”. It is also true that those seeds were watered and fertilized by Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats of 2007-2008.

            We cannot correctly navigate our future if we do not admit our past.

        • Christopher says

          October 9, 2019 at 9:46 am

          I did not grab the remote as fast as I could to change the channel when W came on, and still saw it as almost a civic duty to watch his SOTUs whereas I avoid Trump speeches like the plague. I did not sometimes avoid even MSNBC some nights because I could not take more news about how big a jerk my President was that day. Bush made clear we were not at war with Islam; he did not try to ban Muslims. Bush made efforts to reach out to Hispanics; he did not try to build a wall that Mexico would supposedly pay for.

      • jconway says

        October 9, 2019 at 6:12 am

        It’s shocking to me how many people are already forgetting how corrupt and incompetent the Bush administration was. The Iraq War might be the single worst decision in presidential history, and I am genuinely elated that Trump has thus far successfully evaded making a similar one. It’s a low bar to be sure, but Trump is a better President than George W Bush.

        • scott12mass says

          October 9, 2019 at 7:09 am

          Vietnam was pretty bad, Iraq was worse?

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 7:37 am

            Yes, Iraq was worse than Vietnam.

            As bad as Vietnam was, there are several key differences:

            1. South Vietnam was not a key strategic bulwark in the region, protecting an entire region from aggression by hostile parties. Iraq was the largest secular player in the ME and was the key barrier to expansion of the religious extremists that dominated Iran and its satellites. This reality was why Saddam Hussein did not believe — literally until the invasion began — that the US would overthrow him. He knew that to do so was absolutely suicidal for US interests.

            2. South Vietnam was not a reasonably strong sovereign nation and regional player invaded by the US. It was, instead, an already weak and corrupt vestige of WWII colonialism whose population was already shifting to support North Vietnam and its leader (Ho Chi Minh). Our intervention in South Vietnam was to prop up a succession of weak and submissive puppets, not to topple a strong leader who we viewed as “going rogue”.

            3. The Vietnam war was not (too my knowledge at least) an excuse for a direct cash transfer of billions of public dollars to the family businesses of LBJ or Hubert Humphrey and their supporters. Halliburton alone received at least THIRTY NINE BILLION dollars from Dick Cheney, its former CEO, as Vice Presidents. Most of that was in no-bid contracts, many of them secret. I know of no counterpart in Vietnam.

            The Vietnam war certainly a tragic blunder, and should certainly have been avoided. It was, however, a bi-partisan mistaken driven — in my view — by cold-war era misperceptions and insecurities rather than sheer greed and political self-interest. The South Vietnam conflict began during the administration of JFK and was greatly accelerated by LBJ. When the GOP took over in 1968 with Richard Nixon, the scale of the conflict increased (despite campaign promises from Mr. Nixon and the GOP).

            Indeed, the 2003 Iraq war was FAR worse than the Vietnam conflict.

          • jconway says

            October 9, 2019 at 9:04 am

            I think Vietnam was a worse war, but Iraq was a worst decision. My reasoning is that Bush had the lessons of Vietnam and disregarded them to make a war that was entirely one of choice. Vietnam in hindsight did not serve America’s interests, but it was a somewhat inevitable byproduct of Cold War geopolitics. The responsibility for Vietnam is shared by multiple presidents in multiple parties, a key insight from the Pentagon Papers. It would have been a lot harder for any Cold War President to choose to avoid intervening in Vietnam than it was for Bush to choose not to invade Iraq.

            Bush is the sole decider for the Iraq War, he solely owns the Iraq War in a way the Vietnam Presidents do not solely own theirs. The Middle East has been on fire for the last decade and a half because our actions totally reshaped the balance of power in the region. ISIL, the Syrian Civil War, the Iranian-Saudi Cold War that’s rapidly going hot, the Turkish incursion against the Kurds this morning, Israel’s war with Lebanon, Egypt’s chaos, Libya’s civil war, the Arab Spring itself-all of these actions can be directly linked to the Iraq War. Removing a stable, secular, regional balancer ended up destroying the relative peace and stability the region enjoyed prior to the Iraq War. We will be living with its consequences for many decades.

        • SomervilleTom says

          October 9, 2019 at 7:13 am

          Incorrectly nested comment removed.

          Editors: I’m confident that the comment editor moved my reply to the wrong place with no action on my part. I saw the yellow-highlighted comment from scott12mass while I was composing my comment above on a different thread.

          It appears to me that the comment editor focus was incorrectly changed to this thread as part of displaying that new comment by scott12mass.

          I’m not complaining, just offering information for debugging.

        • Christopher says

          October 9, 2019 at 9:47 am

          Your last clause is wrong on so many levels!

          • jconway says

            October 9, 2019 at 12:50 pm

            Who’s last clause? Not your fault Christopher, the nesting is messed up on this thread.

            • SomervilleTom says

              October 9, 2019 at 2:05 pm

              @ who’s last clause:

              I suspect Christopher is objecting to this:
              ” but Trump is a better President than George W Bush.”

              • jconway says

                October 9, 2019 at 7:13 pm

                I stand by that and made my case. Better person, not a better President. I give Bush credit for saying the right thing from time to time, PEPFAR, and being the last president to give the Palestinian leadership equal weight in negotiations. He did a decent non-partisan job with the financial crisis and Obama transition.

                He reauthorized the Voting Rights Act and tried to get immigration reform done. His rhetoric was never racist, sexist, Islamophobic, or homophobic even if his policies were. I’m not offended when Ellen or the Bruins hang out with him, like I would be with Trump. I still say Iraq was worse than anything Trump has done, but we can at least agree that America cannot afford four more years and would have been better off under President Gore.

                • Christopher says

                  October 9, 2019 at 8:27 pm

                  Of course we would have been better off under President Gore, but if my only choices are Trump and Bush it’s no contest. Iraq was not the greatest decision particularly for the time, but I’ve always been more sanguine about that than some. It was more forgivable and explainable than the mob-boss rule we are currently living under.

      • doubleman says

        October 9, 2019 at 10:41 am

        I think my comment got moderated out, but I would say that 1 million dead Iraqis might disagree with your statement.

        But ultimately it does not matter who is “worse.” Both are so incredibly bad that they and every one who enabled them should be pariahs. We have people treating Dick Cheney like a good guy these days. Insanity!

        We had Nixon, and then Reagan, and then Bush, and now Trump. The corruption, the ignorance, and the cruelty is increasing with every major GOP administration. Unless we upend power dynamics and make serious changes, what’s coming after Trump will likely be much worse (younger, smarter, more competent, but also a true believer).

        TRUMP IS NOT AN ABERRATION!!!!!

        Returning to a some ridiculous status quo puts us in exactly the position that allowed and championed Trumpism.

  3. SomervilleTom says

    October 9, 2019 at 12:09 pm

    Meta note

    Something seems to be causing some otherwise non-offending comments on this diary to be moved into the “pending moderation” queue. Three and counting as of 12:10p on 9-Oct-2019.

    • doubleman says

      October 9, 2019 at 12:14 pm

      Yes. Not sure what that is. Maybe filtering out Richard Cheney’s common first name.

      • SomervilleTom says

        October 9, 2019 at 1:52 pm

        Jeesh, I didn’t even think of that. Let me check my pending message and see if it’s something similar.

        For what it’s worth, the way good text engines avoid this kind of stupid mistake is to use something called a “bi-gram” or “n-gram”, where the term is joined to another term and the resulting pair (or n-tuple) is used for the match. It helps avoid flagging “weed the garden” as a drug reference.

      • SomervilleTom says

        October 9, 2019 at 2:02 pm

        Interesting. I think it might well be the reference to Mr. Cheney that caused doubleman’s two comments to be blocked. On closer inspection, I see that both jconway’s comment and mine contain links that result in paywall popups. It wouldn’t surprise me if that triggers the spam filter here.

        I see the same reference to Mr. Cheney in my comment, so maybe that’s what is triggering it.

        I’m not sure what is provoking the issue with the comment from jconway, it looks fine to me.

        • Christopher says

          October 9, 2019 at 3:35 pm

          Has this been an issue before? Surely the former VP’s name has been taken in vain numerous times on BMG.

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 4:25 pm

            I suspect that “Richard Cheney” and “Mr. Cheney” are fine. I suspect “D**k Cheney” gets the comment moderated.

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 4:26 pm

            This is a comment that includes Dick Cheney, to see if it triggers the moderation filter.

          • SomervilleTom says

            October 9, 2019 at 4:28 pm

            I just attempted to post a comment with the following text (except that I did not sanitize Mr. Cheney’s first name)::

            This is a comment that includes D**k Cheney, to see if it triggers the moderation filter.

            The attempt was moderated.

            I think doubleman is correct — the filter flags the string “D**k” as sexual reference.

            • Christopher says

              October 9, 2019 at 8:28 pm

              Maybe it’s the new platform since he was VP since that word is the name he usually goes by and thus I assume is the name we used for him.

              • fredrichlariccia says

                October 10, 2019 at 9:15 am

                “For all the talk about Trump and Russia, there’s also Trump and Ukraine, Trump and Turkey, Trump and Saudi Arabia, and likely elsewhere where the shadow of self-interest and corruption eclipse the clarity of our national interest.” Dan Rather

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 10, 2019 at 11:10 am

                  Two foreign-born criminal clients of ‘Dracula Ghouliani’ have just been arrested on campaign – finance charges.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 10, 2019 at 11:22 am

                  Kurds DID help us win WWII fighting against Hitler in Albania, Italy and Greece.

                • SomervilleTom says

                  October 10, 2019 at 12:03 pm

                  Fred, why are you posting these comments here? BMG is not a news repeater, and this particular thread is a discussion of what causes certain material to pushed to the “pending moderation” queue.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 10, 2019 at 11:29 pm

                  FACT : The Orange Crook is using public authority to advance his corrupt personal advancement.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 10, 2019 at 11:41 pm

                  To the GOP Senate : History is a constant stenographer so grow a spine and do the right thing.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 10, 2019 at 11:49 pm

                  New Fox poll shows Treason Weasel won rural voters by 27 points in 2016 but they now back him by only 2 points over Joe Biden.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 11, 2019 at 10:18 am

                  Former US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, just entered the Capitol to give private, closed door deposition to House investigators.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 11, 2019 at 10:57 am

                  Justice closes in on the Tangerine Wankmaggot as
                  DC Appeals Court just rejected his appeal of the House Oversight Committee’s subpoena for his financial records.

                • terrymcginty says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:04 am

                  “Reality-based commentary.” Enough said.

                  Please, Somerville Tom, try to avoid bullying fellow commenters. That is the minimum standard I would think. If this site becomes a cul-de-sac of irrelevant or disproportate back-scratching of the angels-on-the-head-of-pin left, no one will read it.

                  Rome is burning. Meaning the republic is in danger of crumbling. Let’s not only talk about how the municipal Roman sewerage plant is doing. Let’s also marshall praetorian guards to protect the republic from Caesar. Shall we?

                • SomervilleTom says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:12 am

                  @Please, Somerville Tom, try to avoid bullying fellow commenters.:

                  How have I “bullied” anybody?

                  I asked my friend Fred why he’s posted five news items onto the end of a meta-discussion about what causes a comment to be moderated. How on earth is that “bullying”?

                  I agree that Rome is burning. Since we’re all on the same team, perhaps you might be a bit more cautious about using words like “bullying”.

                • terrymcginty says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:23 am

                  How about letting Fred decide what he would like to write and where he would like to write it? Last time I checked, he’s very capable of making his own editorial judgments without you deciding what constitutes a “meta-discussion”.

                  He seems to appreciate free reign in his fellow BMGers. I simply ask that you grant him the same courtesy. I don’t see where he asked for anyone’s advice.

                • SomervilleTom says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:28 am

                  @How about letting Fred decide what he would would like to write and where he would like to write it?:

                  Indeed — I’ve known Fred for years. In all the time I’ve known him, he’s always been fully capable of speaking up when he feels attacked, threatened or bullied.

                  I don’t think Fred needs you to defend him. He is not a defenseless waif being pushed around.

                  I encourage you to speak for yourself. If you feel that I’m bullying you, then I apologize and I invite your feedback about how I might respond differently.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:33 am

                  I appreciated Terry’s words.

                • Christopher says

                  October 11, 2019 at 7:08 pm

                  I think it is perfectly reasonable to ask people to stay on topic. I find his style to be off-putting as well.

                • SomervilleTom says

                  October 11, 2019 at 11:21 am

                  @bullying:

                  Oh, and by the way — each new comment pushes other comments off the BMG front page.

                  There have been times recently when the comments pane has been flooded with news clips and aphorisms, all from Fred. I don’t want to muzzle Fred or anyone else — I certainly post many comments myself. At the same time, I think the front page is improved when it has content from more than one participant (including yours truly).

                  An option available to Fred is to post a diary, and then update the diary with new items as desired. Fred is still able to publish everything he contributes now. At the same time, those updates would not push other contributions off the comments pane on the front page.

                  I’m really NOT trying to bully anybody, and I certainly apologize to Fred if he felt hurt by my question.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 14, 2019 at 9:13 am

                  Trump is a Russian asset plundering our nation.

                • fredrichlariccia says

                  October 14, 2019 at 9:17 am

                  There’s nothing behind those dead soulless eyes except seething hatred and savage unquenchable greed.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.