Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Wind farms vs. unclean energy

May 15, 2008 By Charley on the MTA

A couple of wind-related items today … First, Terry Murray takes care of business and sets the table to zone our oceans. This will hopefully give us some regulatory clarity for wind farm development and fishing vs. preservation. Good stuff, and this will likely free up the pipeline for other important legislation, like the green energy bill.

And on the unclean energy side … this is really not any kind of surprise at all.

A new lobbying firm for the group opposing a wind farm off Cape Cod filed a federal document last month reporting that its work for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound is partially funded and shaped by an international energy conglomerate.

The disclosure represents the first documented financial connection between the group opposing the wind farm and Oxbow Corp., which mines and markets energy and commodities, including coal, natural gas, and petroleum.

The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound immediately decried the filing as a mistake, and the lobbying firm later amended it in the US Senate Office of Public Records to eliminate the reference to Oxbow.

Oxbow's founder, Osterville yachtsman William I. Koch, has been a cochairman of the alliance since 2005, a year that saw a flurry of congressional attempts to kill the wind farm. While Oxbow maintains that its lobbyists monitor Cape Wind because of the corporation's interest in energy and shipping, Cape Wind proponents assert that Oxbow's lobbyists have been doing far more to fight the wind farm.

Ah yes, a mistake. Of course, whether Koch hmself or Oxbow gave the money and effort is a distinction without a difference, but whatever.

Wind or oil. The oil folks understand that's what's at stake. 

Update: From the comments, stomv posts this very cool map of megawatt wind generation capacity by state. This should prove a motivating irritant to everyone who thinks we ought to be in front of the pack on wind.

Cape Wind would add 468 MW to our capacity.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: cape-wind, energy, environment, fishing, ma-senate, massachusetts, oceans, therese-murray, wind-energy, wind-farms

Comments

  1. stomv says

    May 15, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    <

    p>This comes from the American Wind Energy Association and is updated regularly.

    <

    p>Note: the 3 MW Massachusetts has under construction will allow us to race past idle Vermont and Ohio all the way up to 27th in installed wind energy electrical generation capacity.  If Cape Wind’s 468 MW were installed tomorrow, Massachusetts would be just outside the Top 10 in installed capacity, although it’d fall about 5 slots in the next year or two because states like Kansas, New York, and North Dakota have hundreds of MW under construction right now.

    • sco says

      May 15, 2008 at 1:03 pm

      Is that 0.1 MW just some guy with an open window and a pinwheel?

      • stomv says

        May 15, 2008 at 3:06 pm

        <

        p>It’s the rightmost picture.  A small manufacturing shop called bitworks.  I don’t know the story behind it, but I love that an American manufacturing company installed it.

    • noternie says

      May 15, 2008 at 1:12 pm

      Is there another map somewhere that shows solar or combination? It strikes me that some of the white (0 MW) states might lend themselves to that more.

      <

      p>Makes no sense that they aren’t harnessing more wind from the mountains (and spires) in Utah, though.

      • stomv says

        May 15, 2008 at 3:18 pm

        1.  There’s different kinds of solar.  PV generates electricity, but there’s also solar power for hot water and space heating, and even for heating your pool water.

        <

        p>But even if you just worry about PV…

        <

        p>2.  It’s distributed.  It’s fairly easy to count wind turbines since they’re tall, expensive, and require permitting.  Solar cells, on the other hand, are relatively cheap, small, and can be done without substantial paperwork.  Furthermore,

        <

        p>3.  They’re not all tied to the grid.  So, if I build a cabin in the middle of nowhere where there’s no power anyway, and I throw on a solar cell, is that contributing to the supply grid?  Nope.  Same goes for if I put my solar cell on the top of a highway sign device or some other off-grid application.

        <

        p>So, to answer your question, there’s about 85 MW-dc capacity installed on-grid as of 2006. (source)(pdf)  Wind is roughly 18,500 MW capacity.  What’s nice about solar is that it generates the electricity when demand is highest, but the reality is that solar power is a long way off from making up even 0.01% of the nation’s electricity supply.

        <

        p>Where solar does really well is in heating water.  A passive solar hot water heater can do a wonderful job offsetting your oil, gas, or electric bill associated with heating water for showers and cooking.

  2. joes says

    May 15, 2008 at 12:46 pm

    Maverick oilman T. Boone Pickens places $2 billion bet on wind power in massive Texas project

    NEW YORK (AP) — Maverick oilman T. Boone Pickens has placed a $2 billion bet on wind power in just the first of a four-phase project to build the world’s largest wind farm in Texas.
    Pickens said the total cost of the deal will grow considerably after the initial investment in General Electric Co. turbine technology.

    Pickens’ Mesa Power said the Pampa Wind Project in the Texas Panhandle will eventually cover 400,000 acres and generate enough power for more than 1.3 million homes.

    <

    p>Massachusetts should put the brakes on applications for new electricity generation plants that burn fossil fuel as their source of energy, and up the incentives for renewable, clean energy projects.

    • noternie says

      May 15, 2008 at 1:15 pm

      I read a profile of Pickens in a magazine about a year or so ago in which he mentioned being invested in a bunch of different energy projects, outside of oil. And not just a dollar or two here and there. I’ll refresh my memory and report back.

  3. ryepower12 says

    May 15, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    but, yes, disturbing.

    <

    p>I’m glad that little ‘mistake’ was made, because I wasn’t aware of it in the first place.

    <

    p>As for the two comments in this thread, how much of a difference would both Cape Wind and the proposed project off the South Coast be (which would be a little over half the size of Cape Wind in scope – so still pretty darn big)?

    • stomv says

      May 15, 2008 at 3:04 pm

      would generate about 5% of the electricity Massachusetts consumes.  That would allow MA to reduce any of the following:

      <

      p>coal: 24.4 percent
      oil: 5.2 percent
      natural gas: 51.0%

      <

      p>With natural gas 25% cheaper than a year ago and electricity generation grade petroleum increased 15%, the best bet is that oil will decrease a bit and coal will decrease the rest.  In terms of GHG emissions, oil and coal emit far more CO_2 equivalents than natural gas per MWh of production.

      <

      p> * all numbers are from 2006 (source)(pdf)

      • trickle-up says

        May 15, 2008 at 7:12 pm

        probably coal most of the time, and not necessarily in Mass. (not that it matters much).

        • syphax says

          May 15, 2008 at 10:24 pm

          natural gas is the primary marginal generation; coal is more baseload.  

          <

          p>Also, despite our best efforts at conservation & efficiency, demand in NE has generally been trending up.  So it’s not just displacing existing generation, Cape Wind would also help address the need for new fossil generation, which is going to be expensive, regardless of the fuel.

          <

          p>Cape Wind doesn’t ‘solve’ anything, but it sure is part of the solution.  There are no perfect solutions; we’re going to have to move 1-2% at a time toward a more sustainable energy regime.

          <

          p>Wind has arrived because it’s pretty competitive on pure economics.  Solar isn’t there yet, but it’s coming.  We need both.

          • stomv says

            May 16, 2008 at 12:40 am

            because natural gas turbines can be dialed up and down quickly but coal power plants take more time to increase or decrease production, I’d expect that coal would be reduced, and that gap be replaced by wind when the wind is blowing well, and natural gas when the wind isn’t cooperating.

            <

            p>Price is a factor, but so is meeting instantaneous demand.  So, my guess is that it will take a chunk out of coal or oil due as much to the ability to react to changes in demand as well as supply [of wind] as to price differentials.

  4. hoss1 says

    May 15, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    From what I’ve been reading, a wind boom is imminent as wind farm developers snap up land across the country.  Pretty soon Cape Wind will be an afterthought and wind farms will be beautiful, clean and everywhere.

    • lodger says

      May 16, 2008 at 9:44 am

      they’re just not everywhere.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.