Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Why weren’t they fatal?

October 3, 2008 By Sean

The Globe doesn’t explain, though, why Palin’s performance shouldn’t cause damage, shouldn’t be considered serious error.

On the financial crisis, Palin hammered the theme that McCain is best suited to protect the American people without addressing the fact that McCain has been an unwavering champion of deregulation. Without addressing the fact that John McCain’s most significant takeaway from the S&L crisis was the need for campaign reform, not banking reform.

Palin accused Obama and Biden of waving “the white flag of surrender.”

She repeated the canard that McCain never says different things to different groups despite indisputable evidence of a laundry list of his flip-flops.

Palin repeated the theme that her ticket would bring fresh, new, outside-the-beltway ideas when the top of the ticket has been in congress for 24 years.

It is unfathomable that these — and other statements — are not considered serious errors that cause damage. But, the Globe writes like there is some independent measure of what is or isn’t a problem, instead of acknowledging that the media can and do set the standard.

The Globe should explain why taking a significant position — on the most significant issue of the day — completely at odds with one’s record is not a problem. Why slandering your opponent with allegations of surrender isn’t a problem. Why lying about your ticket-mate is not a problem. Why pretending your ticket-mate is something he is not isn’t a problem.

The Globe chose how to characterize Palin’s performance. The Globe chose not to write that Palin’s performance was damaging.

Imagine an editorial that wrote that Palin’s baseless promises on McCain’s behalf, her unseemly accusations, her lies, and her fantasy-land depiction of McCain as outsider irreparably destroyed any credibility the McCain camp has.

Why the passivity?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: biden, debates, palin

Comments

  1. centralmassdad says

    October 3, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    People will vote for or against McCain or Obama.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.