Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Crocodiles and Foreign Policy

March 8, 2009 By chimpschump

Six weeks into the job, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is starting to roll out the Obama administration’s approach to the most prickly foreign policy challenges from Arab-Israeli peace to Russia.

In her second foreign trip, which ended early on Sunday, Clinton dipped into Middle East peacemaking and promised to work for a “comprehensive” Arab-Israeli peace. She tried to charm European institutions in Brussels and literally hit the “reset” button in strained U.S.-Russia ties during a dinner with Moscow’s foreign minister in Geneva, and then went to Turkey.

Clinton also took first steps to deal directly with traditional enemies, “testing the waters,” she said, of a campaign promise of President Barack Obama to engage rather than isolate protagonists as the Bush administration had done.

In Israel, Clinton announced two U.S. envoys would be in Syria this weekend to explore better ties and as part of a U.S. bid to get a more comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace.

While at NATO headquarters in Brussels, she made the new administration’s first public overtures toward Iran by inviting Tehran to a conference on Afghanistan, possibly at the end of this month.

Right.

Let’s invite the Ayatollah’s pet crocodile and his murderous hench-persons to the table to talk about peace. Which of the two groups the crocs divide the rest of us into, do you suppose Hillary belongs? Will they simply kill her, or kill her and eat her?

And better ties with Syria? Will somebody please explain to me why we would want that? Syria has NEVER had any interest in peace with the West. Why would anyone actually believe they have suddenly come to Jesus?

She was criticized by Palestinians for not being tough on Israel . . .

Of course she was. I mean, heck, She’s an AMERICAN!

But in Israel, where hawkish prime minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to form a government, Clinton faced a tougher challenge in trying to push for Palestinian statehood, which Netanyahu opposes.

I expect Netanyahu is none too enamored of Clinton’s badgering interference in his attempts to form a government under crisis conditions that make ours look like ripples on the waters.

At an aid conference for Gaza in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, she continued the Bush administration’s harsh language over Hamas, saying not one dime of a U.S. aid pledge of $900 million would go to the militant group that runs Gaza.

Great. Nothing wrong with that, on its face. However,

Clinton’s rhetoric on Hamas was so similar to that of her predecessor Condoleezza Rice that the Palestinian newspaper al Quds ran a story with the headline “Condoleezza Clinton.”

I think that here is where the rubber meets the road. Clinton is no Condoleezza Rice. Doctor Rice had a handle on the issues, and also had the respect of both Israel and a grudging Hamas. It is quite evident that Clinton not only does NOT have that respect, but, having struggled to do so during her husband’s administration, has demonstrated to us that she still can’t find the handle.

Probably, to qualify for what she is failing miserably at doing now, she should have paid more attention to her Political Science classes at Wellesley, than to her initiation into Wellesley’s Alternative Sexual Orientation indoctrination.

Put the mail on, Hillary. Before the crocodiles decide we’re all like you.

Best,

Chuck

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: foreign-policy, hillary, leadership, rice

Comments

  1. christopher says

    March 9, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    At first I thought you were describing OUR foreign policy for the last eight years!

  2. lightiris says

    March 9, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    I believe that most sentient people would agree that is an appropriate simile, if not an appropriate reality.

    <

    p>Demonizing nations with whom we have disagreements as subhuman is so childishly Bushian.  I’m not surprised you would find your “simile” “appropriate” or some version of “reality,” given your political leanings, but in no way would “most sentient people” “agree.”  Indeed, most sentient people recognize name-calling as a form of insult that is counterproductive and arrogant, the last stronghold of the intellectually bankrupt.  People have rejected the “evil-doers” and the “axis of evil” rhetoric that characerized the Bush administration’s efforts of diplomacy.  That sort of thing is so 90s.    

    • chimpschump says

      March 10, 2009 at 10:42 am

      The NATIONS mentioned are populated with peoples as oppressed as any in history. Uh, by their governments, which is what I’m demonizing, lightiris. Can you, with a straight face, tell me that the preponderance of behaviors by Kil Il Jung’s government have brought prosperity, benefit and freedom to the peoople of North Korea?

      <

      p>Best,
      Chuck

      • kirth says

        March 10, 2009 at 11:00 am

        Let’s invite the Ayatollah’s pet crocodile and his murderous hench-persons to the table…

        Best,
        Chuck

        • chimpschump says

          March 10, 2009 at 11:09 am

          and his hench-persons rever to the government of Iran, not to its oppressed people.

          <

          p>Best,
          Chuck

      • lightiris says

        March 10, 2009 at 4:19 pm

        Can you, with a straight face, tell me that the preponderance of behaviors by Kil Il Jung’s government have brought prosperity, benefit and freedom to the peoople of North Korea?

        <

        p>Your question is irrelevant, as no one has made such a claim.   I will claim this, however:  you from your Barcalounger and Bush from his White House will never bring “prosperity, benefit and freedom to the peoople of North Korea” by indulging your inner playground bully and calling these people names.  Grow up.

        • kbusch says

          March 10, 2009 at 4:34 pm

          I don’t speak the secret wingnut language so I’m not sure if this point is even expressible within it.

          <

          p>Looking at foreign affairs as if it were game theory, Bush’s bullying (e.g., the Axis of Evil) basically had this message for creepy countries:

          Hi, Creepy Countries!

          I’m a lunatic. I’m gonna blow you guys up unless you arm yourselves with nuclear weapons as quickly as possible. Just to prove it, I’m going to make a huge mess out of Iraq.

          So you have a choice.

          Centrifuges or annihilation.

          This had precisely the predicted effect.

          <

          p>Had neo-conservatives remained in office longer, we would have seen nuclear tests from these guys.

          • lightiris says

            March 10, 2009 at 4:46 pm

            the P.S.:

            <

            p>

            And you’re a big, fat, poopy diaper head, also.

            Best Regards,

            The Decider  

  3. huh says

    March 9, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Do you think all strong women are lesbians or just the ones you disagree with?

    <

    p>I really do wish there was an “unrecommend” button.  

    • chimpschump says

      March 10, 2009 at 11:12 am

      Unfortunately, you fell into the chasm of misinterpretation. My post does not imply that Hillary is a lesbian. But for an education on how the experience impacted her, go read her autobiography, and the biographies others have written about her.

      <

      p>Best,
      Chuck

      • huh says

        March 10, 2009 at 4:05 pm

        Cause, gosh, it certainly seemed to be your implication.

        <

        p>Maybe you’d be better served by a metaphor involving snakes… Or did they invoke the snake 11th commandment to stop you referencing them?

  4. kbusch says

    March 9, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    This is a stupid diary delivered in a tone of intellectual superiority. Given the diary’s topic, the praise lavished on Condoleezza Rice is particularly ironic: If Bush has achieved anything in the Middle East, it has not been to “establish a democracy” there. It has been to hand the “crocodile” an ally. At the center of Iraq’s current government are men whose connection and proximity to Iran goes back decades.

    <

    p>From the stupid point of view advocated by Sec. Rice and our diarist, it’s okay to help the crocodiles in a big way just provided you don’t talk to them.

    As for metaphors, we have a regression. The Bush Administration portrayed everything as a comic book.

    <

    p>Here we have a children’s book about zoo animals.

    • sabutai says

      March 9, 2009 at 6:35 pm

      Crocodiles are not wanton killers….they are predators, true, but not animals that kill for fun.

      • chimpschump says

        March 10, 2009 at 11:14 am

        “Crocodiles are not wanton killers”

        <

        p>Feed one until it is sated. Then, go frolic in the water with it.

        <

        p>I will wait here for you.

        <

        p>Best,
        Chuck

    • edgarthearmenian says

      March 9, 2009 at 7:11 pm

      No.  I didn’t think so.  Just joking with you.  As a matter of fact, I watched the translation blunder on Russian Channel One and she handled herself very, very well and made the best out of an embarrassing situation.  I’ll give her credit where due.

      • chimpschump says

        March 10, 2009 at 11:20 am

        “I’ll give her credit where due.”

        <

        p>Hillary is a brilliant legal mind, one of the sharpest in the country. While I disagree with her interpretations of the consdtitution, and the domestic programs she would implement based on those interpretations, I have respect and admiration for her intellect and approach to solving problems as she sees them.

        <

        p>But domestic is the operative word here. IMHO, Hillary is a fish out of water in her current role, into which she was quite obviously placed to undercut her potential as a Barack Obama political adversary in the 2012 elections.

        <

        p>Best,
        Chuck

    • chimpschump says

      March 10, 2009 at 11:52 am

      As an adjective, means slow-witted, dazed. It would seem that stupid intellectual superiority would be oxymoronic . . .

      • kbusch says

        March 10, 2009 at 12:20 pm

        Lots of elementary school children, you know the type that read scary stories about crocodiles, speak in a tone of remarkable intellectual superiority as if they knew absolutely everything.

        <

        p>This can be charming in a child. In an adult, it is stupid intellectual superiority.

        • chimpschump says

          March 10, 2009 at 2:03 pm

          So much rancor, so little time . . .

          • kbusch says

            March 10, 2009 at 2:17 pm

            You apparently have time enough to write an enormous diary that was nothing more than a snark magnet.

  5. laurel says

    March 9, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    why the obsession?

    <

    p>will i be seeing you in olympia on march 19th (anti-equality lobby day)?

    • chimpschump says

      March 10, 2009 at 11:23 am

      I don’t have time to attend such nonsense.

      <

      p>And my post did not deal with homosexuality, other than the oblique reference to Hillary’s Wellesley indoctrination, with an implication as to its impact on her. Perhaps you can go in my stead . . .

      <

      p>Best,
      Chuck

      • kbusch says

        March 10, 2009 at 11:39 am

        “Wellesley indoctrination”: No one here, chimpschump, thinks your use of this term reflects badly on Hillary. It’s as if you expect everyone to be speaking the secret wingnut language.

        <

        p>We don’t. We think it is idiotic.

        • chimpschump says

          March 10, 2009 at 11:57 am

          intellectual superiority, KBusch, you can provide kinder, gentler language to describe Wellesley Indoctrination. Which is preciesly what it was. Calling a spade a frigging shovel doesn’t change it in the slightest.

          • kirth says

            March 10, 2009 at 12:09 pm

            where were you indoctrinated, Chump?

            • chimpschump says

              March 10, 2009 at 2:13 pm

              In the School of Hard Knocks, Division of Applied Psychology, which was operated by Grandfather Home for Children, Avery County, North Carolina. It was an orphanage at the time. Not having the wherewithal to attend an exclusive school, I entered the US Navy instead. It took me nine years to earn my first undergrad degree, thirteen to earn my first Master’s.

            • lightiris says

              March 10, 2009 at 4:08 pm

              an enriched curriculum of freeper-style neoconservatism and rabid homophobic crackpottery can be had wearing nothing but boxer shorts, socks, and a coating of Lays potato chip crumbs in the privacy of one’s home.

              • laurel says

                March 10, 2009 at 4:13 pm

                Are we Cylons???

                • lightiris says

                  March 10, 2009 at 4:24 pm

                  black socks with a hole in the left heel, boxers a shade of otherworldly grey, and Lays crumbs a little green around the edges, just to complete the palette.  I’m certain, too, those crumbs are kinda tangled and stuck in the thigh hair….

                • chimpschump says

                  March 10, 2009 at 6:37 pm

                  You’re both catering to your inner playground bullys . . .

                • lightiris says

                  March 10, 2009 at 7:11 pm

                  Perhaps then what you’ve just experienced is an object lesson in the futility of bullying?    

                  <

                  p>I concede that my behavior towards you in this exchange would qualify as bullying.  You also demonstrate clearly that my bully you neither convinces you to conform to my wishes and nor reveals the “high road” of my thinking.

                  <

                  p>So the lesson is this: bullying behavior by both nations and individuals is unproductive.

                  <

                  p>Thanks for illustrating my point so vividly and succinctly.
                   

              • chimpschump says

                March 10, 2009 at 6:34 pm

                You forgot the dirty T-shirt, lightiris . . .

            • kbusch says

              March 10, 2009 at 7:01 pm

              I’m sure I could rewrite every diary offered by chimpschump and produce something tighter, easier to read, and more convincing. JohnD has this problem, too. Neither knows what to leave out.

              <

              p>Just look at the first two paragraphs. The olive branches and the mailed fists, the two hundred years and Teddy Roosevelt’s foreign policy, the need to say both base and belligerent, it’s all extra crap. No good writer would leave it in an essay.

              <

              p>Further, if you are writing to an ideologically hostile audience, you don’t lard your material with extra controversy. You choose one battle. You marshal a lot of evidence. You set out to win that one battle.

              <

              p>Instead, this essay leaves one questions like:

              1. Who fights crocodiles dressed for a Society for Creative Anachronism event?
              2. Who in their right mind thinks Hillary Clinton, rather than the doctrinaire diarist, was indoctrinated?
              3. What would Teddy Roosevelt say about modern day Syria?
              4. What sorts of pets to do the rulers of Iran really own?
          • kbusch says

            March 10, 2009 at 12:18 pm

            I suppose it would be too much for you to site sources for your fantasies, day dreams, and talks with your stuffed crocodile.

            <

            p>What Wellesley indoctrination?

            • chimpschump says

              March 10, 2009 at 3:30 pm

              foam at the mouth and overwork the adjective ‘stupid,’ go read Ed Klien’s book.

              • kbusch says

                March 10, 2009 at 3:39 pm

                Your source is a gossipy, widely discredited book brimming with factual inaccuracies.

                <

                p>’Nuff said.

                • chimpschump says

                  March 10, 2009 at 6:32 pm

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
23m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America" We now assess it is another Chinese surveillance balloon."
#mepolitics #mapoli #nhpolitics #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Retweet on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Like on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Twitter 1621701812741963776
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
26m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America"
#mepolitics #mapoli #nhpolitics #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Retweet on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Like on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Twitter 1621701130848804864
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
29m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Patrick Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America"
#mepolitics #mapoli #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Retweet on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Like on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Twitter 1621700490823143424
openletterbot Open Letters @openletterbot ·
43m

🖋 Sign and I'll deliver a copy to your officials: https://twitter.com/messages/compose?recipient_id=835740314006511618&text=sign%20PDCRWI 📨 No. 13 is from Emily to @SenMarkey and @SenWarren #MA04 #MApoli #MApols

Reply on Twitter 1621696742017363968 Retweet on Twitter 1621696742017363968 1 Like on Twitter 1621696742017363968 Twitter 1621696742017363968
repkearney Patrick Kearney @repkearney ·
55m

It’s -4 outside and like a proper New Englander I’m having @nonashomemade ice cream. Shoutout to all the Scituate small businesses on this February’s First Friday #mapoli @ Scituate Harbor https://www.instagram.com/p/CoOSzeVMAIZ/?igshid=YTgzYjQ4ZTY=

Reply on Twitter 1621693771732733952 Retweet on Twitter 1621693771732733952 Like on Twitter 1621693771732733952 1 Twitter 1621693771732733952
projectbread Project Bread @projectbread ·
1h

Thank you, Reo John Barrett, for cosponsoring HD766/SD1013 and investing in the health and future of our children. Passing #SchoolMealsforAll is key to increasing equitable access to healthy, nutritious food for all students –so no child goes hungry. #FeedKidsMa #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Retweet on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Like on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Twitter 1621691006990307328
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.