Race is everything.
by Kevin Sowyrda
We’re living in a crude time of racial centric politics. Nothing new, you say? Then check out the recent news concerning judiciary appointments in both Washington and Boston.
Everything is race. The only thing that matters in Obama era politics, in governing, in policy making, in political appointments and in the media is your race. And for the first time in history, it’s not Caucasian imperialists who are directly reaping the benefits of their light skinned complexion. But in a more cunning, indirect way, it’s the liberal establishment – the still mostly white, modern day power brokers – who are using the race of minorities to squelch the Conservative opposition and achieve the progressive agenda. It’s as effective as it is Machiavellian.
Case in point, this week’s presidential nomination of New York Judge Sonia Sotomayor for a seat on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor wasn’t picked because she’s the reincarnation, in female visage, of Justice Brandies or because her intellect overshadows that of Stephen Hawking. She was picked because she’s a Hispanic woman and Barack Obama, who remains in perpetual campaign mode, is sufficiently brilliant to realize that he can have all the liberal sycophants his appetite desires if he picks the presently in fashion, once out of fashion, brand of color.
That’s because anyone who opposes this new color du jour must be a racist.
If you bring up Sotomayor’s almost surreal ruling in Ricci vs. DeStafano, where in a painfully oblique edict she obliterated the test results for a group of Connecticut firefighters because an insufficient number of minorities were able to score high on the test, you’ll be branded a racist quicker than Keith Olberman and Rachel Maddow can coordinate their talking points with Rahm Emmanuel at the White House.
If you querie Sotomayor about her ruling that convicted felons should be able to vote, you’ll definitely see Chris Matthews getting the wrong type of tingle up his leg and suddenly you’re shish kabob on the Peacock Network.
If you dare to ask Sotomayor if she was being a little bit too polarizing when she said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”, the Washington Post is going to call you Hispanic Hater of the month and quote an anonymous source that you use the “spik” word while imbibing at South Boston taverns. They’ll hit you with the sexism charge in the Sunday edition.
So the nomination process will be as smooth as silk. We’ll hear the usual suspects on the senate judiciary committee gush, with tear filled eyes, about Sotomayor’s up from the boot straps story. That one always resonates when it’s about a liberal nominee. Sadly, we can’t talk about up from the boot straps stories of more conservative jurists like Clarence Thomas, who grew up in impoverished Pin Point Georgia and was homeless as a little boy after a fire burned down his family home.
And it’s even a twofer. As political scientists on both sides of the aisle predict that the Hispanic vote will only continue to swell, a savvy politician like Mr. Obama is not going to be outflanked by Republicans, who have previously forged cordial relations with Hispanic Americans because of the G.O.P.’s historic position on Cuba. Those policies are as moribund as Fidel himself, and Obama knows that a quota system for Hispanics is the new route to that growing demographic and a key ingredient for his 2012 prospects.
Locally, the racial centric trend is no less intense and obvious than on the national stage. Carmen M. Ortiz has just received the papal blessing from Ted Kennedy and John Kerry to be the new U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts. The panel that recommended her clearly intimated that Carmen, one of three finalists, was actually second in qualifications to prominent local jurists Michael Keating and Martin Murphy, but that her status as a Latina gave her the edge.
Atleast they were honest.