Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

The SCOTUS Decisions Hammer Conservative Movement

June 26, 2015 By steven-j-gulitti 9 Comments

The Court this week has delivered a series of devastating blows to America’s conservative movement with their second decision affirming the constitutionality of Obamacare, today’s decision on same sex marriage along with another decision on discrimination in housing.

It’s been kind of funny watching the Fox crew attempting to recover from the multiple blows sustained by conservatives this week. Conservatives have been looking with regard to upending Obamacare to additional cases wending their way through the lower courts and hoping that these cases will somehow undo what’s already been settled. Political commentator Amy Walter, appearing on Fox News last night, pointed out that many of those cases have already been dismissed and that now with a second affirmative decision on Obamacare, most of the rest will probably be dismissed too or the Court will agree not to hear them.

And conservatives shouldn’t take to much solace in the idea that Obamacare will be undone on Capitol Hill either. Let’s be honest about one reality. Conservatives on Capitol Hill have voted some 50 times to repeal the A.C.A to no avail. Their last presidential effort was based in part in undoing the A.C.A and that failed too. To date the G.O.P. has failed to come up with an comprehensive alternative to the A.C.A. Thus what will change now? Not much likely with regard to Obamacare.

With regard to same sex marriage ruling, one political commentator pointed out that the Court’s decision was based on the 14th Amendment, which addresses civil rights, and said that Supreme Court decisions based on the 14th are almost never reversed in subsequent Court decisions. Likewise lower courts will now have to fall in line with the high court’s decision. That said is there any reason to think that any reasonable Republican will sponsor legislation that seeks to undo the same sex decision?

As an aside, I can’t help but laugh at the follow on commentary on Fox this morning as that networks analysts have spent more time trying to reconcile Justice Thomas’s opinions on same sex and Obamacare then they have coming to terms with the seismic changes that have just taken place.

 

Steven J. Gulitti

 

6/26/2015

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: conservative movement, gay-rights, obamacare, same-sex-marriage, scotus

Comments

  1. johntmay says

    June 26, 2015 at 3:14 pm

    was after the election of Obama in 08…..which as we all recall was followed by the shellacking in 2010 and the emergence of Scott Brown.

    Let’s not get complacent.

    Log in to Reply
    • steven-j-gulitti says

      June 26, 2015 at 7:27 pm

      If the conservative movement’s goals are to turn back the clock by blocking, undoing and defeating progressive initiatives then it’s impossible to deny the fact that they have suffered severe setbacks this week.

      Log in to Reply
      • johntmay says

        June 26, 2015 at 7:51 pm

        on what issues can Democrats “get out the vote”? Republicans vote out of duty. We need issues.

        Log in to Reply
        • steven-j-gulitti says

          June 26, 2015 at 8:41 pm

          Democrats are great at taking a punch and turning the other cheek. What they need to do is to learn how to throw a punch, i.e. to continually go at the right and point out the fallacies and inadequacies of right wing ideology.

          Only then will the Dems be able to launch and sustain an effective offensive against right wing lies and distortions.

          Log in to Reply
  2. steven-j-gulitti says

    June 27, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    Right sees leftward tilt in Roberts Supreme Court era http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/246352-right-sees-leftward-tilt-in-roberts-supreme-court-era

    Log in to Reply
  3. centralmassdad says

    June 30, 2015 at 11:45 am

    Religious “conservatives”– who aren’t really very conservative at all– lost on the SSM case, and partisan Republicans– who are also not particularly conservative– lost on the Obamacare case.

    But actual conservatives scored some pretty big wins:

    a decision upholding Texas’ decision to keep the confederate flag off its license plates, but on grounds that authorize states to engage in viewpoint discrimination (i.e., South Carolina, Texas, and others may keep their anti-abortion special license plates, while banning pro-choice messages from appearing.

    A decision that more or less ends any effort to challenge capital punishment, however administered, as cruel and unusual under the 8th amendment; and probably most significantly

    A decision that greatly expands the concept of “regulatory taking” in a way that is likely to have some significant impact on the regulatory state (that is, by reducing its power significantly); and

    A decision that imposes tough cost-benefit requirements on environmental regulation.

    Those last two can really be described as HUGE conservative victories.

    Log in to Reply
    • SomervilleTom says

      June 30, 2015 at 11:53 am

      Since the “cost” side of those cost-benefit requirements will continue to be manipulated to exclude the present value of the unfolding AGW catastrophe, this decision will ensure that we continue our national policy of climate change denial.

      Log in to Reply
      • centralmassdad says

        June 30, 2015 at 12:39 pm

        They granted cert in Friedrich v. Cal. Teachers Assoc., which will be heard next year, and will likely end the ability of unions to collect dues, except by donation.

        So, nope, I am pretty sure you are getting the expected decisions from a conservative-controlled court.

        Log in to Reply
  4. jconway says

    June 30, 2015 at 3:29 pm

    We should want a court that respects the rule of law and upholds it, respects the Bill of Rights and defends it, and generally acts as a strong civil libertarian counterweight to the majoritarian and bipartisan expanded power/crony capitalist/security state consensus that typically governs Washington. I have walked away from these cases still convinced Justice Kennedy and Roberts are not committed to those principles, and Kelo still leaves a bad taste in my mouth looking at the liberals on the court as well.

    I have always supported same sex marriage and feel that this decision was well reasoned enough to fully justify such protections for the country, but it still fell short of a rational basis test that tore up anti-LGBT discrimination more broadly. ENDA is unlikely to pass this decade thanks to the GOP House, no matter who wins the Presidency or Senate. Housing discrimination is still legal in several states, and trans rights were a complete after thought. Indiana bakers will not enjoy special religious exemptions and privileges, but they can still fire their gay employees or deny them housing.

    Perhaps this wasn’t the right test case to make a more sweeping change, but I fear that Roberts was right in one regard-when he cited Ginsberg discussing Roe and the impact that had on the future, even if he deliberately obscured her main point. The right always plays offense on every issue and never accepts defeat on any issue. Too many liberals will throw up their hands, especially liberal politicians, and say gay rights is over, just as they did after the first phase of the civil rights movement a generation ago. But just as conservatives found ways to chip away and nibble at the bits on all of these fronts, from voting rights to eliminating affirmative action to restricting reproductive choice, they will do so here as well, under the guise of ‘religious liberty’ broadly expanded and merged into corporate personhood thanks to the same Justice Kennedy celebrates at Pride this past weekend.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (1)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesYou hit the nail on the head here. Namely: Holier than T…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI appreciate you writing this diary. This primary seems…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

massauditor Suzanne M. Bump @massauditor ·
26m

You can help us make government work better. Tell us where you see waste and abuse by government agencies or contractors. https://www.mass.gov/how-to/report-waste-and-abuse #MAPoli

Reply on Twitter 1559249866194313218 Retweet on Twitter 1559249866194313218 Like on Twitter 1559249866194313218 Twitter 1559249866194313218
repsmitty34 Smitty Pignatelli @repsmitty34 ·
27m

AG and candidate for Governor @maura_healey is my guest on this week's episode of 'Let's Talk with Smitty.' She has taken on the biggest fights as the people's lawyer and will be a Governor for ALL of us. Visit https://linktr.ee/repsmitty to listen.
#mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559249722644258821 Retweet on Twitter 1559249722644258821 Like on Twitter 1559249722644258821 1 Twitter 1559249722644258821
strat4youth Strategies for Youth @strat4youth ·
32m

Be an informed voter for youth justice! Join the voter education forum in-person or virtually on August 16 from 1:30-3 PM. Learn more and register today: https://lnkd.in/ejEaKtXB #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559248429624266756 Retweet on Twitter 1559248429624266756 Like on Twitter 1559248429624266756 Twitter 1559248429624266756
darraghcmurphy Darragh Murphy @darraghcmurphy ·
32m

I hope every voter in Suffolk Co reads and rereads this comment until they understand the implications of having a DA Arroyo so inexperienced that he is not qualified to sit as SECOND chair on a Suffolk Co murder trial as prosecutor or public defender. #BosPoli #MaPoli #NoArroyos

Jessamyn Jones @jessamynejones

@orennimni This comment is woefully ignorant & verifiably false. Hayden spent 2x as many years as a defense attorney than Arroyo. Arroyo has so little experience that he does not meet the reqs to lead a jury trial, or even sit 2nd chair on a murder trial, as a public defender or ADA.

Reply on Twitter 1559248399660195842 Retweet on Twitter 1559248399660195842 Like on Twitter 1559248399660195842 Twitter 1559248399660195842
darraghcmurphy Darragh Murphy @darraghcmurphy ·
39m

Substantive question for @RicardoNArroyo that would help voters differentiate his #SuffolkDA candidacy from DA Hayden’s. Will Ricardo answer? Go after illegal guns or nah, Ricardo? #BosPoli & #MaPoli

Jessamyn Jones @jessamynejones

This account also loves to criticize @dakevinhayden for enforcing gun laws in communities most grievously impacted by gun violence. Does @ricardonarroyo agree w/ @CourtWatchMA that DA should deemphasize illegal gun possession? Will it be on his expanded #DNPlist? #bospoli #mapoli https://twitter.com/CourtWatchMA/status/1559220406371995648

Reply on Twitter 1559246767107047425 Retweet on Twitter 1559246767107047425 Like on Twitter 1559246767107047425 Twitter 1559246767107047425
scmurnane Steven Murnane Jr @scmurnane ·
39m

Voting to tank the #NoCostCalls bill, and now endorsing DA Hayden over @RicardoNArroyo? I think its time for her to go. #mapoli

Lydia Edwards @LydiaMEdwards

Happy to endorse @DAKevinHayden for DA! https://twitter.com/dakevinhayden/status/1559176032732811267

Reply on Twitter 1559246757724315649 Retweet on Twitter 1559246757724315649 1 Like on Twitter 1559246757724315649 1 Twitter 1559246757724315649
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.