Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Nothing Natural About Fracked Gas

August 26, 2015 By thegreenmiles

Another Fireball shot from the San Bruno Fire.We don’t call it “natural oil” or “natural coal.” So why do we refer to methane gas – especially the gas that’s been fracked – as “natural”?

Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which allows the gas to flow out to the head of the well. […]

The extensive use of fracking in the US, where it has revolutionised the energy industry, has prompted environmental concerns.

The first is that fracking uses huge amounts of water that must be transported to the fracking site, at significant environmental cost. The second is the worry that potentially carcinogenic chemicals used may escape and contaminate groundwater around the fracking site.

If all that isn’t enough, fracked gas also destabilizes our climate and causes earthquakes. Fracking now produces half of the oil and a majority of the gas produced in the United States.

This isn’t a semantic debate – it has a real impact in moving public opinion. Ask voters if they want more natural gas and most say yes. Ask if they support fracking and a plurality oppose it.

If you’re trying to convince voters to oppose fracked gas pipelines or power plants, call it fracked gas. It’s accurate, it communicates the damage caused by fossil fuels, and it’s politically effective.

Cross-posted from The Green Miles

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: energy, fracking, natural-gas

Comments

  1. Christopher says

    August 27, 2015 at 4:14 pm

    Lowell public buses proclaim that they run on clean natural gas. Would it be accurate to say that gas does in fact burn cleaner than oil, but the process for extracting it is worse? If you had to choose between oil and natural gas, which on balance has the least negative environmental impact, accounting for both production and consumption?

    • SomervilleTom says

      August 27, 2015 at 10:08 pm

      I defer to BMG participants more qualified than me — stomv comes to mind.

      My perception is that natural gas emits fewer particulates when burned in an internal-combustion engine than diesel oil. I also think that the technology to scrub the particulate emissions of diesel oil is reasonably effective and reasonably mature.

      I think there is no one answer about “environment impact”. Methane (natural gas) inescapably releases CO2 when burned. I don’t have a handle on the precise chemistry, but I think the CO2 emissions of methane versus oil for a given BTU content are comparable.

      Methane is itself an extremely potent greenhouse gas, and more methane being moved around means more un-burned methane leaking into the atmosphere.

      I think pretty much all fossil fuel is destructive to the environment during production.

      My bottom line is that the claim that natural gas is “cleaner” is dated, and significantly understates the CO2 footprint of those “clean” buses.

      • thegreenmiles says

        August 28, 2015 at 6:22 am

        The short version is that fracked gas creates fewer local pollutants like sulfur, mercury, particulates, and smog-forming nitrogen oxide. But it’s just as bad for our climate, so why would we invest in fracked gas fuel infrastructure that will leave us locked in to fossil fuels for decades when we could go straight to electric buses that can run off totally clean solar & wind power?

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.